CommunityData:Critique and Feedback Session: Difference between revisions
m (→Schedules) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
If you don't get a chance to give your feedback verbally, you can send the author a marked up PDF or make notes on the Etherpad / Riseup Pad during the C&F session. | If you don't get a chance to give your feedback verbally, you can send the author a marked up PDF or make notes on the Etherpad / Riseup Pad during the C&F session. | ||
*INFO SERVICE EXPIRATION FOR communitydata.science | |||
Attention: Accounts Payable / Domain Owner / Editing CommunityData:Critique and Feedback Session (section) - CommunityData | |||
Your Domain: www.communitydata.science | |||
Expected Reply before: May 12, 2023. | |||
* | This Notice for: www.communitydata.science will expire on May 12, 2023. | ||
*For details and to make a payment for communitydata.science services by credit card: | |||
Visit: https://hostingsrl.com/?web=communitydata.science | |||
05122023191449(07) 3045 9751 | |||
Latest revision as of 05:24, 13 May 2023
==> Organizing a C + F? Check our Facilitator Tips
Before the Session[edit]
If you are submitting to a Critique and Feedback Session, please be aware of a norm collection for submitters.
If you're attending, expectations are in our norm collection for attendees.
When we meet, these sessions will be run with no presentations and no formal introductions. The plan to just jump in and start answering the questions and talking about thing we've all already read.
During the Session[edit]
Norms and Values[edit]
- Take the entire group as an audience: the best feedback is beneficial or thought-provoking to the group as a whole, prompts group discussion/consideration, asks a question, etc.
- If the author is your only audience, be practical and actionable for the project's current stage. Early-stage work is expected to be a little unpolished and crunchy, and proposing a large new branch of analysis for a nearly-complete work should be approached with a scoping statement (Must this be done for the work to be valid? Or are you proposing a follow-up line of inquiry to be stated in the Future Work section?)
- Don't dogpile -- time is short, so even positive plus-ones should be brief: don't repeat what others have said, don't feel the need to chime in or pile on a critique: it is assumed that you read the paper and are supportive of the author.
- Avoid vaguebooking. "Framework needs some work" or "Lacking some flow" isn't as useful as "I don't think you're getting a lot out of using Foucault, Latour, and Habermas here, and explaining them is pretty heavy -- maybe you can get away with just invoking Benkler and moving on" and experience-grounded comments like "When you transitioned from section 2 to section 3, and half-way through section 4, I ended up flipping back to the abstract to figure out what was going on".
- Don't narrate the typo you found on line 156: feedback best conveyed via a marked-up draft should be delivered via a marked-up draft.
If you don't get a chance to give your feedback verbally, you can send the author a marked up PDF or make notes on the Etherpad / Riseup Pad during the C&F session.
- INFO SERVICE EXPIRATION FOR communitydata.science
Attention: Accounts Payable / Domain Owner / Editing CommunityData:Critique and Feedback Session (section) - CommunityData
Your Domain: www.communitydata.science Expected Reply before: May 12, 2023.
This Notice for: www.communitydata.science will expire on May 12, 2023.
- For details and to make a payment for communitydata.science services by credit card:
Visit: https://hostingsrl.com/?web=communitydata.science
05122023191449(07) 3045 9751
