We wanted to create an opportunity for our work to help the communities we study and for researchers to form strong connections and a better understanding of community needs. For this first meeting, we decided we wanted the virtual event to be two hours long, including a break. We wanted the event to be in two separate parts, so that if someone could only come for half it would still feel consistent. We wanted to use a video chat service that met the accessibility needs of our audience. We wanted people to have fun, have enough time to talk with one another, and to be able to engage with the content.
For this session, we had a few goals:
- have speakers who were really excited to speak
- have two sessions that relate to one another
We tried a few different methods of meeting these and eventually looked over recent publications that people had been giving presentations on. I wanted the our first Dialogue to be easy on speakers, so I liked picking topics they'd been working on recently.
Our schedule was divided into: Presentation; a period for Aaron and/or Mako to add a little contextualization for practitioners; and small group discussions.
We thought about several categories of people we wanted to invite to the event: community organizers (practitioners) who support their communities on the ground day-to-day; people who manage or influence community organizers, keep an eye on communities, or otherwise interact with communities; other researchers; and people who have leadership positions within communities and are concerned with their overall health. We drew heavily from our own social networks.
It was a tough decision to invite people rather than doing an open call. Since this was our first time, we wanted the attendee list to feel manageable, especially as we were planning for time in small groups to discuss how the research relates to their own communities and experiences.
Many, many people who register for a free event don't make it. That's okay! About 50% of registrants attended (including us). Some could only make it for half of the event.
More on Logistics
We generally use jit.si for our meetings. However, the publicly hosted instance of jit.si does not have auto-captioning which can limit the accessibility of meetings. We looked into options, and then decided to use Zoom to host the event (a note on this below).
It was important to me to have a solid Virtual Event Code of Conduct that would help and protect attendees while also meeting our desires for how we want the event to look. We combined several codes of conduct and added a few additional notes that we thought were relevant for the event.
Things That Could Have Gone Better
I wanted to end with a list of some things that could have gone better. One of our intentions was to have an event, learn, and then iterate. Here are some takeaways:
- Zoom doesn't do closed captioning in breakout rooms, but it does in the main room.
- We scheduled a lot of time for small group discussion rather than having a big group question and answer session. Next time, we'll plan either shorter small group discussions and Q&A time, or just have Q&A time as a big group.
- We put some effort into sharing information about attendees (and us) with other attendees beforehand. We could have done more of this, which might have been helpful for us as organizers, speakers, and for the attendees to know who they want to talk with.
- Aaron and Mako did some contextualizing between presentations and small group discussions. We knew other people in the room had a lot of valuable things to say there, and next time we'd like to ask them to participate in this part.
- Record Zoom to the cloud. Never record Zoom to local.