The Wikipedia Adventure: Difference between revisions

From CommunityData
Line 10: Line 10:
* read & discuss new draft sections (Aaron)
* read & discuss new draft sections (Aaron)
* plan next revision (Sneha & Aaron)
* plan next revision (Sneha & Aaron)
* upload to sharelatex (Sneha)


===Friday, May 6th===  
===Friday, May 6th===  
Line 19: Line 20:
*** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies).
*** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies).
* revise the discussion (make sure Jake's concerns are addressed).
* revise the discussion (make sure Jake's concerns are addressed).
* upload to sharelatex and share completed draft with collaborators
* share completed draft with collaborators


===Friday, May 13th===
===Friday, May 13th===

Revision as of 20:09, 29 April 2016

Project page for The Wikipedia Adventure

Timeline for CSCW submission

Friday, April 29

  • draft methods from survey study (Sneha)
  • draft results from survey study (Sneha)
  • draft restructuring of section headers (Sneha)
  • recover old pieces of design rationale and add to system design section (Sneha)
  • read & discuss new draft sections (Aaron)
  • plan next revision (Sneha & Aaron)
  • upload to sharelatex (Sneha)

Friday, May 6th

  • revise subsections for study 1 to keep refining structure (see Aaron's comments in the document)
  • revise introduction and framing.
    • add justification for 2-study design
    • incorporate the argument that large-scale field testing is important.
      • challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members
      • large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies).
  • revise the discussion (make sure Jake's concerns are addressed).
  • share completed draft with collaborators

Friday, May 13th

  • incorporate feedback from collaborators (double check with Jake)

Friday, May 20th

  • read it a hundred times, make sure the title works

Friday, May 27th

  • submit final version! (though earlier is better)