The Wikipedia Adventure: Difference between revisions
From CommunityData
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
== Current TO DO list == | == Current TO DO list == | ||
* Revise introduction to focus on two study framing | * Revise introduction to focus on two study framing | ||
**Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important | **Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important | ||
*** challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members | *** challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members | ||
*** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies). | *** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies). | ||
* Fill in section about "Why Gamify Being a Wikipedian?" | |||
* Refine prior work section on gamification | * Refine prior work section on gamification | ||
* Incorporate UIST model paper system evaluation stuff suggested by Mako | * Incorporate UIST model paper system evaluation stuff suggested by Mako | ||
** Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model. | ** Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model. | ||
| Line 28: | Line 25: | ||
** Explain why TWA didn't alter behavior | ** Explain why TWA didn't alter behavior | ||
* Add overarching discussion & conclusion sections | * Add overarching discussion & conclusion sections | ||
** Make sure to | ** Make sure to address big contributions | ||
* Analyze differential attrition | * Analyze differential attrition | ||
* Redo bar chart graphics | |||
* Fix citations | |||
==Timeline for CSCW 2017 submission== | ==Timeline for CSCW 2017 submission== | ||
Revision as of 20:30, 13 May 2016
Project page for The Wikipedia Adventure paper co-authored by Sneha Narayan, Jake Orlowitz, Jonathan Morgan, Mako Hill, and Aaron Shaw.
Current Status
We are in the process of revising this for submission to CSCW 2017. The timeline and milestones for submission are living on this page (below).
Resources
- We're writing on sharelatex. The project lives here.
- Bibliography is currently stored in a shared zotero directory. Aaron and Mako can share access if needed.
Current TO DO list
- Revise introduction to focus on two study framing
- Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important
- challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members
- large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies).
- Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important
- Fill in section about "Why Gamify Being a Wikipedian?"
- Refine prior work section on gamification
- Incorporate UIST model paper system evaluation stuff suggested by Mako
- Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model.
- Refine organization of Study 1 findings
- Refine Study 2 Discussion (Jmo)
- Explain why TWA didn't alter behavior
- Add overarching discussion & conclusion sections
- Make sure to address big contributions
- Analyze differential attrition
- Redo bar chart graphics
- Fix citations
Timeline for CSCW 2017 submission
Friday, May 13th
- redo survey bar charts and graphics
- get citations working
- build up a prior work section gamified tutorials
Friday, May 20th
- read it a hundred times, make sure the title works
Friday, May 27th
- submit final version! (though earlier is better)
