Editing Practice of scholarship (Spring 2019)/week 4 session plan
From CommunityData
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* Becker book chapter discussion | * Becker book chapter discussion | ||
:: What fears motivate being terrorized by The Literature? How reasonable/salient are they for you? | :: What fears motivate being terrorized by The Literature? How reasonable/salient are they for you? | ||
| Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
:: Where and how does Becker situate this study in relation to prior work? | :: Where and how does Becker situate this study in relation to prior work? | ||
:: What shortcomings of this paper does Becker identify/regret in the book chapter? | :: What shortcomings of this paper does Becker identify/regret in the book chapter? | ||
* Shaw & Hargittai paper discussion | * Shaw & Hargittai paper discussion | ||
:: How would you characterize the ''genre'' (along the lines of Zuckerman's collection) of this paper? | :: How would you characterize the ''genre'' (along the lines of Zuckerman's collection) of this paper? | ||
| Line 16: | Line 13: | ||
:: How does the paper use prior work to motivate/justify its own approach? | :: How does the paper use prior work to motivate/justify its own approach? | ||
:: How convincing do you find the use of prior work to be here? | :: How convincing do you find the use of prior work to be here? | ||
* | * Peer feedback discussion | ||
** Two tropes of prior work feedback | |||
* Two tropes of prior work feedback | |||
::: Prior studies leading the narrative | ::: Prior studies leading the narrative | ||
::: Lack of focus/precision | ::: Lack of focus/precision | ||
* | * Prep for week 5 | ||
:: Return to original peer pairings from week 2 | :: Return to original peer pairings from week 2 | ||
