Norm collection for submitters: Difference between revisions
From CommunityData
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* If this is your first submission, Ignore All Rules. Your first submission gives us a chance to get to know you better. The collective is experienced in responding to work in a wide range of states: we'll find useful responses to anything you send. | * If this is your first submission, Ignore All Rules. Your first submission gives us a chance to get to know you better. The collective is experienced in responding to work in a wide range of states: we'll find useful responses to anything you send. | ||
* If this is not your first submission, please consider the following operative norms: | * If this is not your first submission, please consider the following operative norms: | ||
# What type of work should you send, and at what stage? | |||
* Research proposals or outlines are encouraged. | * Research proposals or outlines are encouraged. | ||
* Early-stage projects benefit from the broad range of expertise we represent; submitting them to C+F can help you with your thinking about what direction to take. | * Early-stage projects benefit from the broad range of expertise we represent; submitting them to C+F can help you with your thinking about what direction to take. | ||
* Late-stage projects that are already as good as you can make them may benefit from the "blind spot" detection that a diverse audience offers -- but if you won't be making many changes regardless of what reviewers find because you're close to a deadline, be clear about this. | * Late-stage projects that are already as good as you can make them may benefit from the "blind spot" detection that a diverse audience offers -- but if you won't be making many changes regardless of what reviewers find because you're close to a deadline, be clear about this. | ||
# What size work is considered reasonable? Please consider a maximum of about 5000 words; if your work is longer, offer a guide to reading just the parts you think would most benefit from broad collective feedback. | |||
# The basic rule: C+F is your chance to tap a shared pool of reviewer resources. Be judicious in your consumption of this CPR. | |||
Revision as of 09:55, 13 July 2020
The following are proposed norms for people submitting to Critique and Feedback Sessions.
- If this is your first submission, Ignore All Rules. Your first submission gives us a chance to get to know you better. The collective is experienced in responding to work in a wide range of states: we'll find useful responses to anything you send.
- If this is not your first submission, please consider the following operative norms:
- What type of work should you send, and at what stage?
* Research proposals or outlines are encouraged. * Early-stage projects benefit from the broad range of expertise we represent; submitting them to C+F can help you with your thinking about what direction to take. * Late-stage projects that are already as good as you can make them may benefit from the "blind spot" detection that a diverse audience offers -- but if you won't be making many changes regardless of what reviewers find because you're close to a deadline, be clear about this.
- What size work is considered reasonable? Please consider a maximum of about 5000 words; if your work is longer, offer a guide to reading just the parts you think would most benefit from broad collective feedback.
- The basic rule: C+F is your chance to tap a shared pool of reviewer resources. Be judicious in your consumption of this CPR.
