Online Communities and Crowds (Spring 2025)/Community advising report
Community Advising Report
Overview
As a final project for the course, you will be required to complete a Community Advising Report. For this report, you are invited to serve as an expert advisor to the leaders and members of an online community or crowd and to provide evidence-based insights into how to better address a specific challenge they face.
Unlike with the Wikipedia Advising Report, you will select your own community/crowd and challenge. You are encouraged to choose a community/crowd of which you are a member/leader and where you could, even if only in theory, deliver your recommendations to other members/leaders and have some chance of seeing the recommendations debated/adopted. You are expected to draw on sources and evidence from the course as well as any additional materials you deem relevant/useful. Please note that you are required to submit a proposal explaining the setting and topic of your planned report and to secure written approval of this proposal.
A warning: if all you say boils down to, "You need to convince more different kinds of people to edit Wikipedia" or "You should make it easier to edit Wikipedia," we won't be very impressed. Better insights will draw on intelligent reflections on the themes and materials of this course to make more concrete, specific, and sophisticated recommendations that carefully consider potential drawbacks and unintended consequences.
Format, style, and submission
The format of these reports is up to you. If you want to use graphs, illustrations, bullet points, tables, or section headings, do so. But whatever their format, your report should feature clear, readable, correct, and persuasive prose. Citations should be consistently and properly formatted (Kate Turabian’s "Manual for Writers", available in the library, is a reliable guide as are various online resources for standard style guides such as the 7th edition of American Psychological Association style). Remember, you are trying to look good and provide a compelling, readable artifact that will persuade your audience to adopt your recommendations.
Your finished report should be submitted as a PDF via Canvas.
Please include your name somewhere (prominent!) in the document that you submit as well as your last name at the beginning of the filename (e.g., "Shaw-occ-report.pdf").
Assessment rubric for Community Advising Reports
Your report will be assessed along the following dimensions and criteria, which overlap a great deal with Aaron's general assessment rubric for written work. Keep in mind, these dimensions and criteria don't correspond to specific point values or anything like that. They also tend to escalate in terms of difficulty. An exceptional report does all of these things exceptionally; a very good paper does all of these things well; a good paper does most of these things well; etc.
Clarity & style: Is the paper readable and clear? Is it free of errors? Is the writing logically organized and coherent? Are sources appropriately cited/documented?
Quality of analysis: Does the paper provide clear, original, and well-supported arguments and interpretation? Does it identify and analyze the challenge(s) facing the community/crowd effectively? Where possible/reasonable, does the analysis draw on relevant evidence to support its claims and recommendations?
Scope: Does the argument adapt a suitable scope given the length constraints of the assignment? Does it provide a thorough and focused analysis of the key issues at hand? Is there an appropriate balance between high-level generalities and specific details?
Quality of insight: Does the paper propose a clear strategy, design, and/or actions in response to the challenge? Do the proposed strategy, design, and/or actions seem compelling and worth adopting given the evidence presented? Do the proposed strategies, designs, and/or actions reflect a creative and sophisticated synthesis of available evidence, relevant course materials, and other resources the author has chosen to draw upon?
