User:Groceryheist/drafts/Data Science Syllabus: Difference between revisions
Groceryheist (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Groceryheist (talk | contribs) (course policies) |
||
Line 459: | Line 459: | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
== Policies == | |||
The following general policies apply to this course. | |||
=== Attendance === | |||
As detailed in [[Teaching Assessment | my page on assessment]], attendance in class is expected of all participants. If you need to miss class for any reason, please contact a member of the teaching team ahead of time (email is best). Multiple unexplained absences will likely result in a lower grade or (in extreme circumstances) a failing grade. In the event of an absence, you are responsible for obtaining class notes, handouts, assignments, etc. | |||
=== Respect === | |||
Students are expected to treat each other, and the instructors, with respect. Students are prohibited from engaging in any kind of harassment or derogatory behavior, which includes offensive verbal comments or imagery related to gender, gender identity and expression, age, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, ethnicity, or religion. In addition, students should not engage in any form of inappropriate physical contact or unwelcome sexual attention, and should respect each others’ right to privacy in regards to their personal life. In the event that you feel you (or another student) have been subject to a violation of this policy, please reach out to the instructors in whichever form you prefer. | |||
The instructors are committed to providing a safe and healthy learning environment for students. As part of this, students are asked not to wear any clothing, jewelry, or any related medium for symbolic expression which depicts an indigenous person or cultural expression reappropriated as a mascot, logo, or caricature. These include, but are not limited to, iconography associated with the following sports teams: | |||
# Chicago Blackhawks | |||
# Washington Redskins | |||
# Cleveland Indians | |||
# Atlanta Braves | |||
=== Devices in Class === | |||
Electronic devices (e.g., phones, tablets, laptops) are not going to permitted in class. If you have a documented need to use a device, please contact me ahead of time to let me know. If you do get permission to use a device, I will ask you to sit in the very back of the classroom. | |||
The goal of this policy is to help you stay focused and avoid distractions for yourself and your peers in the classroom. This is really important and turns out to be much more difficult in the presence of powerful computing devices with brightly glowing screens and fast connections to the Internet. For more on the rationale behind this policy, please read [https://medium.com/@cshirky/why-i-just-asked-my-students-to-put-their-laptops-away-7f5f7c50f368 Clay Shirky’s thoughtful discussion of his approach to this issue]. | |||
<!-- Of course, we will discuss assignments and topics that involve referring to things online. Toward that end, you might find it convenient to bring a laptop or tablet to class. If you want to look something up on your device outside of a time I clearly point out are device-allowed, please ask me. | |||
I will always point out explicitly in class if it's OK to use devices. | |||
'''Except during these parts of class — which — I ask that you refrain from using your laptops, tablets, phones, and pretty much any (digital) device with a screen.''' --> | |||
=== Electronic Mail Standards of Conduct === | |||
Email communications (and all communications generally) among UW community members should seek to respect the rights and privileges of all members of the academic community. This includes not interfering with university functions or endangering the health, welfare, or safety of other persons. With this in mind, in addition to the [http://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=478-120 University of Washington's Student Conduct Code], I establishes the following standards of conduct in respect to electronic communications among students and faculty: | |||
* If, as a student, you have a question about course content or procedures, please use the online discussion board designed for this purpose. If you have specific questions about your performance, contact me directly. | |||
* I strive to respond to Email communications within 48 hours. If you do not hear from me, please come to my office, call me, or send me a reminder Email. | |||
* Email communications should be limited to occasional messages necessary to the specific educational experience at hand. | |||
* Email communications should not include any CC-ing of anyone not directly involved in the specific educational experience at hand. | |||
* Email communications should not include any blind-CC-ing to third parties, regardless of the third party’s relevance to the matter at hand. | |||
=== Academic integrity and plagiarism === | |||
As a University of Washington student, you are expected to practice high standards of academic honesty and integrity. You are responsible to understand and abide by [http://www.washington.edu/admin/rules/policies/WAC/478-121-107.html UW’s Student Governance Code on Academic Misconduct], and the [http://www.washington.edu/admin/rules/policies/WAC/478-121-107.html UW’s Administrative Code on Academic Misconduct], and to comply with verbal or written instructions from the professor or TA of this course. This includes plagiarism, which is a serious offense. All assignments will be reviewed for integrity. All rules regarding academic integrity extend to electronic communication and the use of online sources. If you are not sure what constitutes plagiarism, read [https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/589/02/ this overview] in addition to UW’s policy statements. | |||
I am committed to upholding the academic standards of the University of Washington’s Student Conduct Code. If I suspect a student violation of that code, I will first engage in a conversation with that student about my concerns. If we cannot successfully resolve a suspected case of academic misconduct through our conversations, I will refer the situation to the department of communication advising office who can then work with the COM Chair to seek further input and if necessary, move the case up through the College. | |||
While evidence of academic misconduct may result in a lower grade, I will not unilaterally lower a grade without addressing the issue with you first through the process outlined above. | |||
Other academic integrity resources: | |||
* [http://www.washington.edu/teaching/cheating-or-plagiarism/ Center for Teaching and Learning: Cheating or Plagiarism] | |||
* [https://depts.washington.edu/grading/pdf/AcademicResponsibility.pdf University of Washington Student Academic Responsibility (PDF)] | |||
=== Disability and accommodations === | |||
As part of ensuring that the class is as accessible as possible, the instructors are entirely comfortable with you using whatever form of note-taking method or recording is most comfortable to you, including laptops and audio recording devices. The instructors will do their best to ensure that all slides and scripts/notes are immediately available online after a lecture has concluded. In addition, if asked ahead of time we can try to record the audio of individial lectures for students who have learning differences that make audiovisual notes preferable to written ones. | |||
If you require additional accommodations, please contact Disabled Student Services: 448 Schmitz, 206-543-8924 (V/TTY). If you have a letter from DSS indicating that you have a disability which requires academic accommodations, please present the letter to the instructors so we can discuss the accommodations you might need in the class. If you have any questions about this policy, reach out to the instructors directly. | |||
For more information on disability accommodations, and how to apply for one, please review [http://depts.washington.edu/uwdrs/current-students/accommodations/ UW's Disability Resources for Students]. | |||
=== Assignments and coursework === | |||
Grades will be determined as follows: | |||
* 20% Participation | |||
* 20% Reading reflections | |||
* 20% Midterm project | |||
* 40% Final project | |||
You are expected to produce work in all of the assignments that reflects the highest standards of professionalism. For written documents, this means proper spelling, grammar, and formatting. | |||
Late assignments will not be accepted; if your assignment is late, you will receive a zero score. Again, if you run into an issue that necessitates an extension, please reach out. | |||
[[Category:Groceryheist drafts]] | |||
[[Category:Groceryheist drafts]] | [[Category:Groceryheist drafts]] |
Revision as of 19:04, 15 March 2019
- Data Science and Organizational Communication
- Principal instructor
- Nate TeBlunthuis
- Course Catalog Description
- Fundamental principles of data science and its implications, including research ethics; data privacy; legal frameworks; algorithmic bias, transparency, fairness and accountability; data provenance, curation, preservation, and reproducibility; human computation; data communication and visualization; the role of data science in organizational context and the societal impacts of data science.
Course Description
The rise of "data science" reflects a broad and ongoing shift in how many teams, organizational leaders, communities of practice, and entire industries create and use knowledge. This class teaches "data science" as practiced by data-intensive knowledge workers but also as it is positioned in historical, organizational, institutional, and societal contexts. Students will gain an appriciation for the technical and intellectual aspects of data science, consider critical questions about how data science is often practiced, and envision ethical and effective science practice in their current and future organiational roles. The format of the class will be a mix of lecture, discussion, in-class activities, and qualitative and quantitative research assignments.
The course is designed around two high-stakes projects. In the first stage of the students will attend the Community Data Science Workshop (CDSC). I am one of the organizers and instructors of this three week intensive workshop on basic programming and data analysis skills. The first course project is to apply these skills together with the conceptual material from this course we have covered so far to conduct an original data analysis on a topic of the student's interest. The second high-stakes project is a critical analysis of an organization or work team. For this project students will serve as consultants to an organizational unit involved in data science. Through interviews and workplace observations they will gain an understanding of the socio-technical and organizational context of their team. They will then synthesize this understanding with the knowledge they gained from the course material to compose a report offering actionable insights to their team.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this course, students will be able to:
- Understand what it means to analyze large and complex data effectively and ethically with an understanding of human, societal, organizational, and socio-technical contexts.
- Consider the account ethical, social, organizational, and legal considerations of data science in organizational and institutional contexts.
- Combine quantitative and qualitative data to generate critical insights into human behavior.
- Discuss and evaluate ethical, social, organizational and legal trade-offs of different data analysis, testing, curation, and sharing methods.
Schedule
Course schedule (click to expand)
Week 1
- Introduction to Human Centered Data Science
- What is data science? What is human centered? What is human centered data science?
- Assignments due
- Fill out the pre-course survey
- Attend week 1 of CDSW
- Read: Provost, Foster, and Tom Fawcett. Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data 1.1 (2013): 51-59.
- Readings assigned
- Read: Barocas, Solan and Nissenbaum, Helen. Big Data's End Run around Anonymity and Consent. In Privacy, Big Data, and the Public Good. 2014.
- Homework assigned
- Reading reflection
- Attend week 2 of CDSW
- Kling, Rob and Star, Susan Leigh. Human Centered Systems in the Perspective of Organizational and Social Informatics. 1997
Week 2
- Ethical considerations
- privacy, informed consent and user treatment
- Assignments due
- Week 1 reading reflection
- Readings assigned
- Read: boyd, danah and Crawford, Kate, Six Provocations for Big Data (September 21, 2011). A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, September 2011. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926431
- Homework assigned
- Reading reflection
- Attend week 2 of CDSW
- Assignment 1: Data curation
Week 3
- Reproducibility and Accountability
- data curation, preservation, documentation, and archiving; best practices for open scientific research
- Assignments due
- Week 2 reading reflection
- Attend week 2 of CDSW
- Readings assigned
- Read: Duarte, N., Llanso, E., & Loup, A. (2018). Mixed Messages? The Limits of Automated Social Media Content Analysis. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, 81, 106.
- Homework assigned
- Reading reflection
- Attend week 3 of CDSW
Week 4
- Interrogating datasets
- causes and consequences of bias in data; best practices for selecting, describing, and implementing training data
- Assignments due
- Reading reflection
- Readings assigned (Read both, reflect on one)
- Barley, S. R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of ct scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(1), 78–108.
- Orlikowski, W. J., & Barley, S. R. (2001). Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other? MIS Q., 25(2), 145–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250927
- Homework assigned
- Reading reflection
- A1: Data curation
Week 5
- Technology and Organizing
- Assignments due
- Week 4 reading reflection
- A1: Data curation
- Readings assigned
- Passi, S., & Jackson, S. J. (2018). Trust in Data Science: Collaboration, Translation, and Accountability in Corporate Data Science Projects. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 2(CSCW), 136:1–136:28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274405
- Homework Assigned
- Reading reflection
- A2: Bias in data
Week 6
- Data science in Organizational Contexts
- Assignments due
- Week 5 reading reflection
- A2: Bias in data
- Readings assigned (Read both, reflect on one)
- Wang, Tricia. Why Big Data Needs Thick Data. Ethnography Matters, 2016.
- Shilad Sen, Margaret E. Giesel, Rebecca Gold, Benjamin Hillmann, Matt Lesicko, Samuel Naden, Jesse Russell, Zixiao (Ken) Wang, and Brent Hecht. 2015. Turkers, Scholars, "Arafat" and "Peace": Cultural Communities and Algorithmic Gold Standards. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15)
Week 7
- Introduction to mixed-methods research
- Big data vs thick data; integrating qualitative research methods into data science practice; crowdsourcing
- Assignments due
- Reading reflection
- Readings assigned (Read both, reflect on one)
- Donovan, J., Caplan, R., Matthews, J., & Hanson, L. (2018). Algorithmic accountability: A primer. Data & Society, 501(c).
- Astrid Mager. 2012. Algorithmic ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society 15, 5: 769–787. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.676056
- Homework assigned
- Reading reflection
Week 8
- Algorithms
- algorithmic fairness, transparency, and accountability; methods and contexts for algorithmic audits
- Assignments due
- Reading reflection
- A4: Final Project Plan
- Readings assigned
- Hill, B. M., Dailey, D., Guy, R. T., Lewis, B., Matsuzaki, M., & Morgan, J. T. (2017). Democratizing Data Science: The Community Data Science Workshops and Classes. In N. Jullien, S. A. Matei, & S. P. Goggins (Eds.), Big Data Factories: Scientific Collaborative approaches for virtual community data collection, repurposing, recombining, and dissemination.
- Homework assigned
- Reading reflection
Week 9
- Data science for social good
- Community-based and participatory approaches to data science; Using data science for society's benefit
- Assignments due
- Reading reflection
- A4: Final project plan
- Readings assigned
- Berney, Rachel, Bernease Herman, Gundula Proksch, Hillary Dawkins, Jacob Kovacs, Yahui Ma, Jacob Rich, and Amanda Tan. Visualizing Equity: A Data Science for Social Good Tool and Model for Seattle. Data Science for Social Good Conference, September 2017, Chicago, Illinois USA (2017).
- Homework assigned
- Reading reflection
- Resources
- Daniela Aiello, Lisa Bates, et al. Eviction Lab Misses the Mark, ShelterForce, August 2018.
Week 10
- User experience and big data
- Design considerations for machine learning applications; human centered data visualization; data storytelling
- Assignments due
- Reading reflection
- Readings assigned
- NONE
- Homework assigned
- A5: Final presentation
Week 11
- Final presentations
- course wrap up, presentation of student projects
- Assignments due
- A5: Final presentation
- Readings assigned
- none!
- Homework assigned
- A6: Final project report (by 11:59pm)
Week 12: Finals Week (No Class Session)
- NO CLASS
- A6: FINAL PROJECT REPORT DUE BY 11:59PM
Policies
The following general policies apply to this course.
Attendance
As detailed in my page on assessment, attendance in class is expected of all participants. If you need to miss class for any reason, please contact a member of the teaching team ahead of time (email is best). Multiple unexplained absences will likely result in a lower grade or (in extreme circumstances) a failing grade. In the event of an absence, you are responsible for obtaining class notes, handouts, assignments, etc.
Respect
Students are expected to treat each other, and the instructors, with respect. Students are prohibited from engaging in any kind of harassment or derogatory behavior, which includes offensive verbal comments or imagery related to gender, gender identity and expression, age, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, body size, race, ethnicity, or religion. In addition, students should not engage in any form of inappropriate physical contact or unwelcome sexual attention, and should respect each others’ right to privacy in regards to their personal life. In the event that you feel you (or another student) have been subject to a violation of this policy, please reach out to the instructors in whichever form you prefer.
The instructors are committed to providing a safe and healthy learning environment for students. As part of this, students are asked not to wear any clothing, jewelry, or any related medium for symbolic expression which depicts an indigenous person or cultural expression reappropriated as a mascot, logo, or caricature. These include, but are not limited to, iconography associated with the following sports teams:
- Chicago Blackhawks
- Washington Redskins
- Cleveland Indians
- Atlanta Braves
Devices in Class
Electronic devices (e.g., phones, tablets, laptops) are not going to permitted in class. If you have a documented need to use a device, please contact me ahead of time to let me know. If you do get permission to use a device, I will ask you to sit in the very back of the classroom.
The goal of this policy is to help you stay focused and avoid distractions for yourself and your peers in the classroom. This is really important and turns out to be much more difficult in the presence of powerful computing devices with brightly glowing screens and fast connections to the Internet. For more on the rationale behind this policy, please read Clay Shirky’s thoughtful discussion of his approach to this issue.
Electronic Mail Standards of Conduct
Email communications (and all communications generally) among UW community members should seek to respect the rights and privileges of all members of the academic community. This includes not interfering with university functions or endangering the health, welfare, or safety of other persons. With this in mind, in addition to the University of Washington's Student Conduct Code, I establishes the following standards of conduct in respect to electronic communications among students and faculty:
- If, as a student, you have a question about course content or procedures, please use the online discussion board designed for this purpose. If you have specific questions about your performance, contact me directly.
- I strive to respond to Email communications within 48 hours. If you do not hear from me, please come to my office, call me, or send me a reminder Email.
- Email communications should be limited to occasional messages necessary to the specific educational experience at hand.
- Email communications should not include any CC-ing of anyone not directly involved in the specific educational experience at hand.
- Email communications should not include any blind-CC-ing to third parties, regardless of the third party’s relevance to the matter at hand.
Academic integrity and plagiarism
As a University of Washington student, you are expected to practice high standards of academic honesty and integrity. You are responsible to understand and abide by UW’s Student Governance Code on Academic Misconduct, and the UW’s Administrative Code on Academic Misconduct, and to comply with verbal or written instructions from the professor or TA of this course. This includes plagiarism, which is a serious offense. All assignments will be reviewed for integrity. All rules regarding academic integrity extend to electronic communication and the use of online sources. If you are not sure what constitutes plagiarism, read this overview in addition to UW’s policy statements.
I am committed to upholding the academic standards of the University of Washington’s Student Conduct Code. If I suspect a student violation of that code, I will first engage in a conversation with that student about my concerns. If we cannot successfully resolve a suspected case of academic misconduct through our conversations, I will refer the situation to the department of communication advising office who can then work with the COM Chair to seek further input and if necessary, move the case up through the College.
While evidence of academic misconduct may result in a lower grade, I will not unilaterally lower a grade without addressing the issue with you first through the process outlined above.
Other academic integrity resources:
- Center for Teaching and Learning: Cheating or Plagiarism
- University of Washington Student Academic Responsibility (PDF)
Disability and accommodations
As part of ensuring that the class is as accessible as possible, the instructors are entirely comfortable with you using whatever form of note-taking method or recording is most comfortable to you, including laptops and audio recording devices. The instructors will do their best to ensure that all slides and scripts/notes are immediately available online after a lecture has concluded. In addition, if asked ahead of time we can try to record the audio of individial lectures for students who have learning differences that make audiovisual notes preferable to written ones.
If you require additional accommodations, please contact Disabled Student Services: 448 Schmitz, 206-543-8924 (V/TTY). If you have a letter from DSS indicating that you have a disability which requires academic accommodations, please present the letter to the instructors so we can discuss the accommodations you might need in the class. If you have any questions about this policy, reach out to the instructors directly.
For more information on disability accommodations, and how to apply for one, please review UW's Disability Resources for Students.
Assignments and coursework
Grades will be determined as follows:
- 20% Participation
- 20% Reading reflections
- 20% Midterm project
- 40% Final project
You are expected to produce work in all of the assignments that reflects the highest standards of professionalism. For written documents, this means proper spelling, grammar, and formatting.
Late assignments will not be accepted; if your assignment is late, you will receive a zero score. Again, if you run into an issue that necessitates an extension, please reach out.