Editing User:Benjamin Mako Hill/Assessment
From CommunityData
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
* '''Fluency:''' Are you able to refer to relevant course concepts from lecture and the non-case material in framing your answers or opinions. Can you engage in synthesis using material we've covered? | * '''Fluency:''' Are you able to refer to relevant course concepts from lecture and the non-case material in framing your answers or opinions. Can you engage in synthesis using material we've covered? | ||
For every question answered during the year, I will assess readiness and participation as "GOOD", "SATISFACTORY", or "POOR | For every question answered during the year, I will assess readiness and participation as "GOOD", "SATISFACTORY", or "POOR". These correspond to a 4.0, a 3.0, and 2.0 on the UW 4.0 undergraduate grade scale. I am generous and, in the past, the large majority of answers (~90%) have been assessed as GOOD. | ||
=== Absence from class === | === Absence from class === |