The Wikipedia Adventure

Project page for The Wikipedia Adventure paper co-authored by Sneha Narayan, Jake Orlowitz, Jonathan Morgan, Mako Hill, and Aaron Shaw.

Current Status

We are in the process of revising this for submission to CSCW 2017. The timeline and milestones for submission are living on this page (below).

We're writing on sharelatex. The project lives here.
Bibliography is currently stored in a shared zotero directory. Aaron and Mako can share access if needed.

Revise introduction to focus on two study framing
- Change framing to show that two studies were always part of the plan
- Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important
  - challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members
  - large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies).
Incorporate UIST model paper system evaluation stuff suggested by Mako
- Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model.
Add overarching discussion & conclusion sections (sn, jm)
- Make sure to address big contributions
Redo bar chart graphics
Add citations currently in text
Note that most studies on gamified systems don't do quantitative impact assessment, highlight this as a contribution of our study
emphasize hypotheses in study 2, and introduction
change language around Teahouse
add more descriptive information about the sample and experiment in Study 2

Refine organization of Study 1 findings (sn) [Done]
Analyze differential attrition in Study 2 (sn) [Done]
Add overarching discussion & conclusion sections (sn, jm) [Done]
- make sure to address big contributions
Fill in as many "TO DO" items as possible in the doc (sn) [Done]
- Refine prior work section on gamification (Mako)
Incorporate UIST model paper system evaluation stuff suggested by Mako
- Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model.
Refine Study 2 Discussion (Jmo, Sneha) [Done]
- Explain why TWA didn't alter behavior
get extracted data from the bar charts and redo graphics (sn)

Add more descriptive info on sample and experiment in Study 2 (sn, as)
insert new graphics (sn)
add and fix citations (sn)
Emphasize hypotheses in study 2 (sn)
change language around how we talk about Teahouse (Jm, sn)
highlight contribution to gamification literature (jm, sn)
do multiple passes through the whole paper, editing language, grammar and everything else (sn, as, whoever else wants to)
share this with folks peer reviewing CSCW paper (sn)