The Wikipedia Adventure: Difference between revisions
From CommunityData
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
* revise discussion to incorporate two study framing, and make sure concerns about framing TWA as a failure are addressed (Sneha) | * revise discussion to incorporate two study framing, and make sure concerns about framing TWA as a failure are addressed (Sneha) | ||
* make sure the description of study 1 is consistent with how Jake and Jonathan remember conducting it (Sneha) | * make sure the description of study 1 is consistent with how Jake and Jonathan remember conducting it (Sneha) | ||
* | * Analyze differential attrition in field experiment (Sneha) | ||
* Beef up systems design and evaluation section (Jonathan, Jake) | |||
** Explain design rationale | |||
** Identify key features | |||
** Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model. | |||
===Friday, May 13th=== | ===Friday, May 13th=== | ||
* redo survey bar charts and graphics | * redo survey bar charts and graphics | ||
| Line 55: | Line 59: | ||
** See Mako for other sources | ** See Mako for other sources | ||
** Hamari HICCS | ** Hamari HICCS | ||
Revision as of 18:43, 9 May 2016
Project page for The Wikipedia Adventure paper co-authored by Sneha Narayan, Jake Orlowitz, Jonathan Morgan, Mako Hill, and Aaron Shaw.
Current Status
We are in the process of revising this for submission to CSCW 2017. The timeline and milestones for submission are living on this page (below).
Resources
- We're writing on sharelatex. The project lives here.
- Bibliography is currently stored in a shared zotero directory. Aaron and Mako can share access if needed.
Timeline for CSCW 2017 submission
Friday, April 29
- draft methods from survey study (Sneha)
- draft results from survey study (Sneha)
- draft restructuring of section headers (Sneha)
- recover old pieces of design rationale and add to system design section (Sneha)
- read & discuss new draft sections (Aaron)
- plan next revision (Sneha & Aaron)
- upload to sharelatex (Sneha)
Tuesday, May 3rd
- send out draft of paper to collaborators (Sneha)
Friday, May 6th
- revise subsections for study 1 to keep refining structure (see Aaron's comments in the document)
- revise introduction and framing.
- add justification for 2-study design
- incorporate the argument that large-scale field testing is important.
- challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members
- large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies).
- share completed draft with collaborators and solicit feedback on revision plans
Thursday, May 12th
- revise discussion to incorporate two study framing, and make sure concerns about framing TWA as a failure are addressed (Sneha)
- make sure the description of study 1 is consistent with how Jake and Jonathan remember conducting it (Sneha)
- Analyze differential attrition in field experiment (Sneha)
- Beef up systems design and evaluation section (Jonathan, Jake)
- Explain design rationale
- Identify key features
- Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model.
Friday, May 13th
- redo survey bar charts and graphics
Friday, May 20th
- read it a hundred times, make sure the title works
Friday, May 27th
- submit final version! (though earlier is better)
Revision plans
- Change framing to focus on gamification as well
- Examples from Jake's notes
- See Mako for other sources
- Hamari HICCS
