Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision |
Your text |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == 11/17 Agenda == | | == 11/17 Agenda == |
| * Planning documents
| |
| ** In general, very good. Mostly we wanted more details about the measures, variables, and how you plan to analyze them. It will really benefit you to get very specific about this sooner rather than later!
| |
| ** Please come meet with us as you continue to develop these projects. This is a small class. We can provide very "bespoke" attention to your projects. Take advantage of this! We have office hours and can make additional time/appointments as-needed!
| |
| ** In Aaron's case, I'm also happy to meet after thanksgiving, but the price of admission to any such meeting is a draft table and/or figure with (preliminary) results! ;)
| |
| ** Another thing I observed that you might consider is identifying a "model paper" that can help serve as a rough template for the kinds of analysis you plan to do and how to report them. Note that Aaron and Nick can help you assess whether your model paper meets whatever expectations/hopes we might have for how you analyze your data and report your results.
| |
| ** The next deadlines on this project are a (recorded) presentation and the paper itself. We'll talk a bit more about these (likely on Thursday?), but for now please note that I have asked you to submit data + code alongside your finished paper (if possible). If for some reason, doing so is not possible, please get in touch.
| |
| * PS7: Univariate regression and the "bread and peace" model of U.S. elections.
| |
| ** SQ1: walk through interpretation of results.
| |
| ** SQ2: how normal do residuals need to be??? how to diagnose issues??
| |
|
| |
| Additional comments from Nick:
| |
| * Revisiting confidence intervals for regression coefficients. | | * Revisiting confidence intervals for regression coefficients. |
| ** What precisely do they mean? | | ** What precisely do they mean? |
