Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in or
create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == 10/29 Agenda ==
| |
|
| |
| * OS Ch 7 exercises
| |
| ** What to do with/about violations of assumptions? (e.g., 7.12b)
| |
| ** Causality (again)
| |
| *** 7.12c: Did the lead do it?
| |
| *** Trick-or-treating experiment from Aronow et al. (Tuesday): did the treatment do it?
| |
| * T-tests "in the wild"
| |
| ** What should/can you do with this test?
| |
| ** What concerns should you have / take into account?
| |
| * Big picture considerations revisited:
| |
| ** What to do with any test?
| |
| ** How do I know whether I'm using "the right" test when there are seemingly no rules and/or whatever rules exist seem to be breakable (sometimes)?
| |
| * Self-assessment exercise demo/introduction
| |
|
| |
| == 10/27 Agenda == | | == 10/27 Agenda == |
| * Pset 5 PCs | | * Pset 5 PCs |
| ** PC4: interpreting the results of this chi-squared test
| |
| ** plotting error bars, and walking through some of the techniques Aaron used in the PC5 solution | | ** plotting error bars, and walking through some of the techniques Aaron used in the PC5 solution |
| ** review: calculating standard errors. | | ** review: calculating standard errors. |