Research gambits: Difference between revisions
From CommunityData
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Key axes. Where is race in this phenomenon? Where is class? Gender? Sexuality? Ethnicity? Caste? Disability? Nationality? Citizenship? Culture? Age? Rural vs urban? Education? | * Key axes. Where is race in this phenomenon? Where is class? Gender? Sexuality? Ethnicity? Caste? Disability? Nationality? Citizenship? Culture? Age? Rural vs urban? Education? | ||
* Micro to macro. What can we see in individuals, groups, communities, societies | * Micro to macro. What can we see in individuals, groups, communities, societies? Families, neighborhoods, cities, states, countries? | ||
* Cooperation, competition. | * Cooperation, competition. | ||
* Platforms and social media. | * Platforms and social media. |
Revision as of 23:03, 30 August 2022
Eminent sociologist Andrew Abbott wrote the excellent book Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research questions -- and mixing in a few of my own.
- Splitting and lumping. "Folks have mostly studied X and Y together, and they ought to be thought about separately." "Folks have mostly studied X and Y separately, but really these are both examples of Z, and let's study Z."
- Key axes. Where is race in this phenomenon? Where is class? Gender? Sexuality? Ethnicity? Caste? Disability? Nationality? Citizenship? Culture? Age? Rural vs urban? Education?
- Micro to macro. What can we see in individuals, groups, communities, societies? Families, neighborhoods, cities, states, countries?
- Cooperation, competition.
- Platforms and social media.