Research gambits: Difference between revisions

From CommunityData
(Created page with "Eminent sociologist Andrew Abbott wrote the excellent book '''Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences'''. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research question...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Eminent sociologist [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Abbott| Andrew Abbott]]  wrote the excellent book '''Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences'''. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research questions -- and mixing in a few of my own.
Eminent sociologist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Abbott| Andrew Abbott]  wrote the excellent book '''Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences'''. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research questions -- and mixing in a few of my own.


* Splitting and lumping. "Folks have mostly studied X and Y together, and they ought to be thought about separately." "Folks have mostly studied X and Y separately, but really these are both examples of Z, and let's study Z."  
* Splitting and lumping. "Folks have mostly studied X and Y together, and they ought to be thought about separately." "Folks have mostly studied X and Y separately, but really these are both examples of Z, and let's study Z."  

Revision as of 23:02, 30 August 2022

Eminent sociologist Andrew Abbott wrote the excellent book Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research questions -- and mixing in a few of my own.

  • Splitting and lumping. "Folks have mostly studied X and Y together, and they ought to be thought about separately." "Folks have mostly studied X and Y separately, but really these are both examples of Z, and let's study Z."
  • Key axes. Where is race in this phenomenon? Where is class? Gender? Sexuality? Ethnicity? Caste? Disability? Nationality? Citizenship? Culture? Age? Rural vs urban? Education?
  • Micro to macro. What can we see in individuals, groups, communities, societies.
  • Cooperation, competition.
  • Platforms and social media.