Editing Practice of scholarship (Spring 2019)
From CommunityData
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
Your final project for the course is a submission-ready manuscript for a peer reviewed conference or journal of your choosing. It should follow the style, length, and formatting guidelines of the venue in which you seek to publish it. | Your final project for the course is a submission-ready manuscript for a peer reviewed conference or journal of your choosing. It should follow the style, length, and formatting guidelines of the venue in which you seek to publish it. | ||
== Evaluation and grades == | == Evaluation and grades == | ||
Line 206: | Line 204: | ||
=== Week 7: May 13 — Introduction & Conclusion: End up at the beginning === | === Week 7: May 13 — Introduction & Conclusion: End up at the beginning === | ||
'''Reading:''' | '''Reading:''' | ||
* Little, Andrew T. 2016. "[http://www.andrewtlittle.com/papers/little_intros.pdf Three Templates for Introductions to Political Science Articles]." Manuscript, Cornell University. | * Little, Andrew T. 2016. "[http://www.andrewtlittle.com/papers/little_intros.pdf Three Templates for Introductions to Political Science Articles]." Manuscript, Cornell University. | ||
Line 224: | Line 221: | ||
=== Week 8: May 20 — Revise, revise, revise === | === Week 8: May 20 — Revise, revise, revise === | ||
'''Reading:''' | '''Reading:''' | ||
* Becker, Chapter 3 ("One Right Way") and Chapter 4 ("Editing by Ear"). | * Becker, Chapter 3 ("One Right Way") and Chapter 4 ("Editing by Ear"). | ||
* | * Becker, Howard. 1953. [http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2771989.pdf "Becoming a Marihuana User."](pdf) ''American Journal of Sociology'', ''(59)''3: 235-242. (Revisit this and focus on the writing). | ||
* Strunk & White. Chapter 2 ("Elementary Principles of Composition") and Chapter 5 ("An Approach to Style"). | * Strunk & White. Chapter 2 ("Elementary Principles of Composition") and Chapter 5 ("An Approach to Style"). | ||
* Wajcman, Judy. 2019. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918795041 The Digital Architecture of Time Management]. ''Science, Technology, & Human Values'', ''44''(2), 315–337. | * Wajcman, Judy. 2019. [https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918795041 The Digital Architecture of Time Management]. ''Science, Technology, & Human Values'', ''44''(2), 315–337. | ||
'''Assignment:''' | '''Assignment:''' | ||
* Revision assignment: Using Becker and Strunk & White as inspirations, please TBA <!--- prepare to line-edit the rough draft texts that Aaron circulates via email/canvas (one by TBA [link] and one by [https://canvas.northwestern.edu/ Aaron]). Read them, maybe bring a hard copy with you if you like to edit that way.---> In class, we will focus on improving the tone, style, and organization of the texts. | |||
* Work on accomplishing your goals for your final project for this week (''no written assignment to submit or provide feedback on''). Note that you will be asked to provide an update on your progress to your discussant from the May 17 class. | * Work on accomplishing your goals for your final project for this week (''no written assignment to submit or provide feedback on''). Note that you will be asked to provide an update on your progress to your discussant from the May 17 class. | ||
Line 238: | Line 234: | ||
=== Week 10: June 3 — Submission, reviews, and revision in publication === | === Week 10: June 3 — Submission, reviews, and revision in publication === | ||
'''Reading:''' | '''Reading:''' | ||
* King, Brayden. 2011. [https://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/the-editors-speak-what-makes-a-good-review/ "The editors speak: what makes a good review?] (read the entire post and all the statements from the journal editors). ''OrgTheory''. | * King, Brayden. 2011. [https://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/the-editors-speak-what-makes-a-good-review/ "The editors speak: what makes a good review?] (read the entire post and all the statements from the journal editors). ''OrgTheory''. | ||
* Elmqvist, Niklas. 2016. [https://sites.umiacs.umd.edu/elm/2016/11/19/writing-rebuttals/ Writing rebuttals]. | * Elmqvist, Niklas. 2016. [https://sites.umiacs.umd.edu/elm/2016/11/19/writing-rebuttals/ Writing rebuttals]. | ||
* Sample paper(s) with sample reviews and sample response(s) to reviews | * Sample paper(s) with sample reviews and sample response(s) to reviews (TBD). | ||
'''Assignment:''' | '''Assignment:''' | ||
Line 251: | Line 244: | ||
=== Week 11: June 10 — Final projects due === | === Week 11: June 10 — Final projects due === | ||
No class meeting today. Submit your final projects | No class meeting today. Submit your final projects via Canvas. | ||
== Resources == | == Resources == |