Editing Introduction to Graduate Research (Fall 2023)/Week 7

From CommunityData
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 4: Line 4:


* Intro to the challenge (5 min)
* Intro to the challenge (5 min)
* Writing activity/discussion (20 min)
* Writing activity/discussion (25 min)
::'''Prompt:''' ''Reflect on the process you followed to develop the final project abstract you submitted for the class this week. Please try, with as much accuracy as possible/reasonable, to identify/list key steps or stages in the process by which you developed and completed this document.''
::'''Prompt:''' ''Reflect on the process you followed to develop the final project abstract you submitted for the class this week. Please try, with as much accuracy as possible/reasonable, to identify/list key steps or stages in the process by which you developed and completed this document.''
* Publishing (20 min)  
* Publishing (25 min)  
** Explore/discuss Aaron's three crude process diagrams ([https://chi2024.acm.org/ CHI]; [https://academic.oup.com/JOC ''Journal of Communication'']; [https://www.science.org/journal/sciadv ''Science Advances''])
** Explore/discuss Aaron's four crude process diagrams ([https://chi2024.acm.org/ CHI]; [https://academic.oup.com/JOC ''Journal of Communication'']; [https://www.science.org/journal/sciadv ''Science Advances'']; Scholarly press)
* Peer reviewing (35 min)
* Reviewing (25 min)
** Peer review discussion provocations (three key themes below)
** Please assess the anonymous reviews you received/gave/observed as part of this week's assignment.
*** The structure/incentives of peer review
*** Being an effective, generous, responsible reviewer
*** Navigating tricky, low quality, and/or misguided reviews


=== Break! ===
=== Break! ===
Please note that all contributions to CommunityData are considered to be released under the Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (see CommunityData:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)