Directed Research Group: The COVID-19 Information Landscape (Fall 2020)
The Covid-19 pandemic has required us to navigate a challenging information landscape. How have our institutions responded, and how have people made sense of the information provided to them? What role have search platforms played in shaping this terrain?
In this Directed Research Group, you'll conduct a content analysis on search engine results collected during the pandemic. The group will be run for 3-5 excellent students interested in engaging in faculty directed research. The research group will be organized by the Community Data Science Collective by Benjamin Mako Hill and Kaylea Champion and will be conducted for UW course credit. We'll analyze the data you collect and reflect on what it can tell us about our response to the crisis.
Prerequisites: Strong reading and writing skills in the English language, a computer you can use during the project, ability to attend team meetings through an online conferencing platform, and a commitment to high-quality results are required. Willingness to work both in a team and independently is required. We strongly prefer candidates with experience in social scientific research methods (such as COM 301). Familiarity with content analysis, R, and Python are all helpful but not required.
Applying: To apply to join this DRG, submit a cover letter and resume to firstname.lastname@example.org. The resume might contain a brief list of recent courses and any relevant work experience, the cover letter could be a description of why you'd like to participate, including your academic or career interests, or what you hope to learn. If selected, you will be able to enroll for 4-5 credits, depending on how much time you can commit to the project (for 4 credits, you commit 12 hours, for 5 credits, you commit 15 hours per week).
DRG Responsibilities and Commitments
As a DRG member, you are joining an active research project, and you are expected to learn both through information presented to you as well as through your own initiative. What you get out of this project will match what you put into it. Communication is essential to keep our collaboration smooth, and your commitment to doing good quality work is essential. We are trying to develop knowledge that will be useful to the public, and that means holding ourselves to maximum standards of accuracy and ethics. Be honest and open about what you do and always do your best: life happens to all of us and we live in interesting times. Work that's a little late is understandable especially if you communicate early and often, but work that's not your best effort can't be accepted.
Key Question: Who are we, what are we trying to do, and how are we going to go about it?
- Scope Review
- Tour and Overview
- Commitments and communication
After-Meeting To-Do Items
- Read the project proposal. Think of at least one question.
- Read our two grounding texts. Write a short answer to the following two questions:
- What is sensemaking?
- What is 'institutional provisioning'?
Key Question: What is "sensemaking"? "Institutional provisioning"? And how do these relate to the idea of the "information landscape"?
- Proposal review: what's missing, confusing, or wrong?
- Your thoughts & writings on theory: does this approach make sense?
- Article summary: one paragraph about your chosen article, answering the following questions:
- What research question is the author trying to answer, or what hypothesis are they trying to test?
- What setting do they use? What kind of data do they gather?
- What methods do they use to extract meaning from the data?
- What conclusions did they draw? Do you believe their conclusions?
- Can this article help us with our project? How?
- Prepare to share your article summary with the group.
[You will receive feedback on your written summary, including either an "OK" or a "Revise and Resubmit" decision.]
Key Question: What have others done related to this topic? How will we analyze this data?
- Present your summary
- Content Analysis
- Research Protocol
- Trial Run
- Review research protocol.
- Do your portion of the first round content analysis [due before next meeting]
Key Question: Is our approach working? How might we adjust our protocol based on what we're seeing in the data?
- Discuss your experience coding data
- Discuss our agreement levels so far
- Plan next steps
Continue Content Analysis
Continue Content Analysis
Continue Content Analysis; Begin Data Analysis
Continue Data Analysis
Finalize Analysis and Write Up Progress
Complete Writing Tasks
- Revision Task
- Dissemination Task