Sociotechnocanonicon/2019 Planning: Difference between revisions
From CommunityData
(replies to Mako) |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
:::*I'm not familiar with any of these but they do seem pretty appealing based on their descriptions, and I'll keep my eye out for opportunities to sojourn into less-adjacent canons from the broader UW. [[User:Kaylea|Kaylea]] ([[User talk:Kaylea|talk]]) 01:27, 16 March 2019 (EDT) | :::*I'm not familiar with any of these but they do seem pretty appealing based on their descriptions, and I'll keep my eye out for opportunities to sojourn into less-adjacent canons from the broader UW. [[User:Kaylea|Kaylea]] ([[User talk:Kaylea|talk]]) 01:27, 16 March 2019 (EDT) | ||
**Maybe this is too close to the wrong canon, but I keep running into Coleman and Schelling and would like to do a more comprehensive read.[[User:Kaylea|Kaylea]] ([[User talk:Kaylea|talk]]) 18:58, 11 April 2019 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:58, 11 April 2019
This space is for adding ideas for the 2019 Sociotechnocanonicon.
Format
- Kaylea liked the jitsi format and participation from non-cdsc
- Would it be feasible to offer reading credit for it? Or would that ruin it?
Content
- Are there other canonical texts we're not getting to?
- What about Marx, Weber, Durkheim?
- Adam Smith, Darwin, Foucault?
- Aristotle, Hobbes, Mill?
- All of these are possible to get from other places including in any number of social theory courses offered at UW. I think I'd have a preference for doing something closer to specifics of what we study but that still has very broad appeal. Olson's wikipedia:The Logic of Collective Action, Marwell and Oliver's The Critical Mass in Collective Action, and/or Axelrod's wikipedia:The Evolution of Cooperation. A more controversial suggestion would be Kropotkin's wikipedia:Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution —mako๛