Organizations and their Effectiveness (2019): Difference between revisions

From CommunityData
m (→‎Further Ideas: removed idea)
Line 84: Line 84:
=== Scheduled Discussions ===
=== Scheduled Discussions ===


* Monday 12:10ish-1:10 Openness
* Monday 12:10ish-1:10 How should we conceptualize organizational "openness"?
* Tuesday 12:40-1:15 [[:wikipedia:Stigmergy|Stigmergy]]🐜🐜🐜
* Tuesday 12:40-1:15 [[:wikipedia:Stigmergy|Stigmergy]]🐜🐜🐜
** [https://wiki.communitydata.science/Organizations_and_their_Effectiveness_(2019)/autocatalysis Initial discussion]
** [https://wiki.communitydata.science/Organizations_and_their_Effectiveness_(2019)/autocatalysis Initial discussion]

Revision as of 22:08, 15 July 2019

Inspiration from Picasso Banksy

This is a page to collect resources, links, and supplementary information related to the Summer Institute on Organizations and their Effectiveness (2019) held at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS) at Stanford University.

The edit button is in the top corner! Click the button, Be bold, and add/organize/discuss as you see fit by hitting the edit button. Please create an account! Once you do so, Mako will make your administrator so you won't have to solve CAPTCHAs anymore.

If you need help with wiki-markup or anything else, check out the help documentation or feel free to contact Mako or email email him for fundamental concerns about the wiki.

If you'd like to create your own etherpad for collaborative note-taking, simply create a new pad and share the URL: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org and feel free to add the link to this page.

Workshop Information

  • The workshop website has more detailed information about (note that a login is required to access some resources).
  • Zotero group: Repository with the full text of everything. Participants should all be invited already but Mako or Clark can add you if you're not on it.

Previous sessions

There are pages in this wiki created in previous sessions:

Papers and Links

Some papers, links, concepts, that were mentioned in our discussions include...

Visit from Mariano-Florentino Cuéllar (Tuesday July, 9th)

Other potentially useful links:

Bob's Round 2 (Wednesday July, 10th)

Organizational Ethnography (Thursday July 11th)

Things that came up:

Rethinking Exit, Voice, and Loyalty (Thursday July 11th)

Climbing Mount Fuji. If you get confused on what to do next, just head on up! When you can't do it any more, you must be on the top of Mount Fuji!

Sara Singer Debrief (Friday July 12th)

Papers about Emotions (Friday July 12th):

Bob on Culture (Friday July 12th)

Legitimacy (Friday July 12)

  • Johnson et al. 2006: Legitimacy as a Social Process. Review of (mostly) the Soc literature on legitimacy up to 2006.
  • Subbady et al. 2017: Legitimacy. Review of a broader swath of organizations work on legitimacy and the development of a useful meta-theoretical framework.
  • Tost 2011: An Integrative Model of Legitimacy Judgements. Review of social psych on legitimacy and development of an integrated process model of how legitimacy cognitive judgments work.

Ideas for things to talk about

Scheduled Discussions

  • Monday 12:10ish-1:10 How should we conceptualize organizational "openness"?
  • Tuesday 12:40-1:15 Stigmergy🐜🐜🐜

Further Ideas

  • Woody and Bob's intellectual journey as scholars (e..g, how do you refine you ideas about networks; how do navigating going in w/ an idea in your head, modifying it over time)
  • Our biggest research "failure"
  • Under what conditions might delegation work? In absence of resources, in high stress, etc.?
  • Emotions and/in organizations (see links above)
  • Technology & organizations

Questions and Answers

If you have a question, add one below. If you've got an answer to a question that's been asked, you should add it too!

What's the Weberian bureaucracy?

There's a section on the section on Weber's theory in the Wikipedia article about bureaucracy. According to that summary, key features include:

  • hierarchical organization
  • formal lines of authority (chain of command)
  • fixed area of activity
  • rigid division of labor
  • regular and continuous execution of assigned tasks
  • all decisions and powers specified and restricted by regulations
  • officials with expert training in their fields
  • career advancement dependent on technical qualifications
  • qualifications evaluated by organizational rules, not individuals

Autocatalysis, stigmergy, and multiple-networks, oh my!

Jon, Clark, and Bob had a brief conversation trying to unpack the autocatalysis argument and draw on Jon's expertise with modeling autocatalytic cycles. Clark's thrown together a strawman sketch of his understanding of the argument for correction, critique, and additional questions.

How are people OK with the IP transfer issue in an NASA-style open innovation?

This Innocentive FAQ provides the firms answers. Here's an interview with the CEO of Innocentive that discusses this in some depth. There's a great HBS case by Karim Lakhani that goes into quite a lot of detail on this.

Key for colors in Bob's slides

Round 1 (SpPs/UpPs):

  • Orange: Unsolved political problems (UpPs) — invisible hand not working
  • Purple: "there is a boss"; e.g., firms, formal organizations
  • Green: organized (but not an organization) — communities, etc.
  • Black (sometimes): Solved political Problems (SpP) — solved by a market

Round 2 (formal/informal governance):

  • Blue: formal governance instruments (contracts, algorithms)
  • Red: informal governance
  • Grey: shared understanding (→culture)`

Round 3:

  • Pink: Building an equilibrium