Online Communities (UW COM481 Fall 2024)/Wikipedia Advising Report: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Prompt) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
;Note: Details on deadlines and how to turn the paper in are on [[../#Wikipedia Task #7-B|the relevant section of the syllabus]]. | ;Note: Details on deadlines and how to turn the paper in are on [[../#Wikipedia Task #7-B|the relevant section of the syllabus]]. | ||
== Prompt == | == Prompt == | ||
Members of the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) are brainstorming approaches for using generative AI and large language models to create Wikipedia content. There is [[:Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Using neural network language models on Wikipedia|a page on Wikipedia about these ideas]] that might be useful to get a sense of what people are considering. | |||
For this assignment, I want you to imagine that the WMF staff has contacted you seeking recommendations on managing the impact of | For this assignment, I want you to imagine that the WMF staff has contacted you seeking recommendations on managing the impact of generative AI tools on the Wikipedia online community. For context, the [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Mission WMF's mission] is: | ||
:''The mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally.'' | :''The mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally.'' | ||
For | For this assignment, it's important to understand that the mission contains both a desire to produce high-quality educational material ''and'' a goal to engage people in its production. | ||
Your job is to produce a short report ( | Your job is to produce a short report (1000 words max) drawing on materials from this class to advise these leaders about how they ought to understand this challenge (generative AI) and how they might progress toward addressing its impact in their community. The best insights will draw on intelligent reflections on the themes and materials of this course to make concrete, specific, and sophisticated recommendations that carefully consider potential drawbacks and unintended consequences. You are welcome to evaluate the specific suggestions in [[:Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Using neural network language models on Wikipedia|the brainstorming page]] or suggest new approaches. | ||
Please note: You do not need to draw on resources beyond the course materials (readings, lectures, assignments, | Please note: You do ''not'' need to draw on resources beyond the course materials (readings, lectures, assignments, case discussions, etc.) to produce your report. However, you may feel free to do so. | ||
== Assessment == | == Assessment == | ||
First and foremost, your report will be evaluated on the degree to which it provides useful, informed, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. It will also be evaluated on the degree to which you engage with the course material. See the [[User:Benjamin Mako Hill/Assessment | writing rubric]] for details on my expectations | First and foremost, your report will be evaluated on the degree to which it provides useful, informed, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. It will also be evaluated on the degree to which you engage with the course material. See the [[User:Benjamin Mako Hill/Assessment | writing rubric]] for details on my expectations regarding the content of the papers. A successful essay will do the following things: | ||
# Provide detailed, concrete, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. What should Wikipedia think about doing? What should they think about changing? | # Provide detailed, concrete, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. What should Wikipedia think about doing? What should they think about changing? | ||
# Justify your recommendations | # Justify your recommendations regarding the theories and principles we've covered. Why should your recommendations be taken more seriously than just random advice from a user? | ||
# To the extent | # To the extent it is relevant, feel free to comment directly on your experience in Wikipedia. When you do so, connect your experiences in Wikipedia explicitly to the concepts in the course material we have covered. | ||
The teaching team will give everybody in the course feedback on their assignment. The basic structure is shorter but extremely similar to what you will | The teaching team will give everybody in the course feedback on their assignment. The basic structure is shorter but extremely similar to what you will do in the final community advising project. As a result, you can treat this as a "mid-term" and make adjustments based on feedback. | ||
== Other guidance == | == Other guidance == | ||
There's no minimum word count, but I'd suggest you take advantage of the space you're given. Generally speaking, you can say more, be more insightful, and demonstrate more fluency (all the things we are assessing) if you use more space. | There's no minimum word count, but I'd strongly suggest you take advantage of the space you're given. Generally speaking, you can say more, be more insightful, and demonstrate more fluency (all the things we are assessing) if you use more space. | ||
Your audience is Wikipedians who may read your report. You don't need to define things to prove to us that you've done the reading. You should define terms if you think | Your audience is Wikipedians who may read your report. You don't need to define things to prove to us that you've done the reading. You should define terms if you think an audience of Wikipedians (who have not taken the class) will be lost/confused otherwise. Use your judgment to make a compelling, well-reasoned, and well-supported argument. The goal is to show that you are fluent in the course material. A fluent person does not try to use every word in a language; they simply use the most appropriate ones. | ||
In terms of | In terms of structure, the introduction-body-conclusion format is reliable and useful. If you feel it's better or more useful to deviate from that. Don't use the numbered questions as your format, but do demonstrate consideration of each point somewhere in your essay. | ||
There is no specific guidance regarding style (e.g., APA, Chicago, etc.) or how to format the references. Ensure we can read the paper clearly and find any papers you cite. | |||
Latest revision as of 19:57, 29 October 2024
- Note
- Details on deadlines and how to turn the paper in are on the relevant section of the syllabus.
Prompt[edit]
Members of the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) are brainstorming approaches for using generative AI and large language models to create Wikipedia content. There is a page on Wikipedia about these ideas that might be useful to get a sense of what people are considering.
For this assignment, I want you to imagine that the WMF staff has contacted you seeking recommendations on managing the impact of generative AI tools on the Wikipedia online community. For context, the WMF's mission is:
- The mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally.
For this assignment, it's important to understand that the mission contains both a desire to produce high-quality educational material and a goal to engage people in its production.
Your job is to produce a short report (1000 words max) drawing on materials from this class to advise these leaders about how they ought to understand this challenge (generative AI) and how they might progress toward addressing its impact in their community. The best insights will draw on intelligent reflections on the themes and materials of this course to make concrete, specific, and sophisticated recommendations that carefully consider potential drawbacks and unintended consequences. You are welcome to evaluate the specific suggestions in the brainstorming page or suggest new approaches.
Please note: You do not need to draw on resources beyond the course materials (readings, lectures, assignments, case discussions, etc.) to produce your report. However, you may feel free to do so.
Assessment[edit]
First and foremost, your report will be evaluated on the degree to which it provides useful, informed, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. It will also be evaluated on the degree to which you engage with the course material. See the writing rubric for details on my expectations regarding the content of the papers. A successful essay will do the following things:
- Provide detailed, concrete, and actionable advice to the Wikipedia community and the Wikimedia Foundation. What should Wikipedia think about doing? What should they think about changing?
- Justify your recommendations regarding the theories and principles we've covered. Why should your recommendations be taken more seriously than just random advice from a user?
- To the extent it is relevant, feel free to comment directly on your experience in Wikipedia. When you do so, connect your experiences in Wikipedia explicitly to the concepts in the course material we have covered.
The teaching team will give everybody in the course feedback on their assignment. The basic structure is shorter but extremely similar to what you will do in the final community advising project. As a result, you can treat this as a "mid-term" and make adjustments based on feedback.
Other guidance[edit]
There's no minimum word count, but I'd strongly suggest you take advantage of the space you're given. Generally speaking, you can say more, be more insightful, and demonstrate more fluency (all the things we are assessing) if you use more space.
Your audience is Wikipedians who may read your report. You don't need to define things to prove to us that you've done the reading. You should define terms if you think an audience of Wikipedians (who have not taken the class) will be lost/confused otherwise. Use your judgment to make a compelling, well-reasoned, and well-supported argument. The goal is to show that you are fluent in the course material. A fluent person does not try to use every word in a language; they simply use the most appropriate ones.
In terms of structure, the introduction-body-conclusion format is reliable and useful. If you feel it's better or more useful to deviate from that. Don't use the numbered questions as your format, but do demonstrate consideration of each point somewhere in your essay.
There is no specific guidance regarding style (e.g., APA, Chicago, etc.) or how to format the references. Ensure we can read the paper clearly and find any papers you cite.
