Latest revision |
Your text |
Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
| |
|
| == Current TO DO list == | | == Current TO DO list == |
| * '''introduction'''
| |
| * '''Background and prior work'''
| |
| ** Continue to improve gamification subsection (mako)
| |
| * '''System design'''
| |
| ** Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model (mako)
| |
| * '''Study 1:'''
| |
| * '''Study 2:'''
| |
| * '''Discussion & Conclusion'''
| |
| ** make sure connections to framing are clear
| |
| * '''Throughout'''
| |
| ** Full read-throughs for tone, consistency, clear contributions.
| |
| ** Proofreading
| |
|
| |
|
| == Recent changes log ==
| | * Revise introduction to focus on two study framing |
| | | **Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important |
| '''These have been addressed, but will likely still benefit from further attention so they're here for archival purposes'''
| |
| | |
| * '''introduction''' | |
| * compress the introduction. reduce redundancy (as)
| |
| ** focus on two study framing
| |
| ** Change framing to show that two studies were always part of the plan
| |
| ** Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important | |
| ** emphasize hypotheses
| |
| *** challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members | | *** challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members |
| *** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies). | | *** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies). |
| * '''Study 1:''' | | * Fill in section about "Why Gamify Being a Wikipedian?" |
| ** replace bar charts w new visualizations (sn) | | * Refine prior work section on gamification |
| * '''Study 2:'''
| | * Incorporate UIST model paper system evaluation stuff suggested by Mako |
| ** emphasize hypotheses | | ** Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model. |
| ** add details of random assignment (sn) | | * Refine organization of Study 1 findings |
| ** add more descriptive information about the sample and experiment | | * Refine Study 2 Discussion (Jmo) |
| ** incorporate randomization check (compare days in study across treatment & control) | | ** Explain why TWA didn't alter behavior |
| ** restrict main analysis to last 100 days of sampling (sn)
| | * Add overarching discussion & conclusion sections |
| *** revise '''all''' reported statistics to reflect this | | ** Make sure to address big contributions |
| ** include boxplots (w scatter) of dependent variables for all treatment and control units.
| | * Analyze differential attrition |
| ** Include Mann-Whitney tests for distribution shift
| | * Redo bar chart graphics |
| * '''Discussion & Conclusion''' | | * Add citations currently in text |
| ** Make sure to address big contributions. | | |
| ** Elaborate explanations of null effect. | | ==Timeline for CSCW 2017 submission== |
| ** Note that most studies on gamified systems don't do quantitative impact assessment, highlight this as a contribution of our | |
|
| |
|
| * '''Throughout'''
| | ===Friday, May 13th=== |
| * re-built refs-processed and eliminated missing citation errors (as)
| |
| * change language around Teahouse (jm)
| |
| ** Add citations currently in text
| |
| ** Remove excess uses of passive voice
| |
| ** Add keywords and ACM categories.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Timeline for CSCW 2017 submission==
| | * redo survey bar charts and graphics |
| | * get citations working |
| | * build up a prior work section gamified tutorials |
|
| |
|
| * do multiple passes through the whole paper, editing language, grammar and everything else (sn, as, whoever else wants to)
| | ===Friday, May 20th=== |
| * share this with folks peer reviewing CSCW paper (sn)
| |
| * read it a hundred times, make sure the title works | | * read it a hundred times, make sure the title works |
|
| |
|
| ===Friday, May 27th=== | | ===Friday, May 27th=== |
| * submit final version! (though earlier is better) | | * submit final version! (though earlier is better) |
|
| |
| == Post-submission TO-DO list ==
| |
|
| |
| * Reproducibility
| |
| ** Create RData files for all datasets, models, results, etc.
| |
| ** Convert paper to .rnw (knitr).
| |
| ** Create communitydata (wiki?) page to host reproducibility content
| |
| ** Make sure git repository is up to date and all files have READMEs
| |
| * Study 2 analysis
| |
| ** Report full models w all model fit stats etc. (presumably we cut this down for the CHI note. No need for CSCW).
| |
| ** Collect additional covariates and include them in the models
| |
| *** user data via API (gender, edit count pre-inclusion in the study, etc.)
| |
| *** added measures should enhance precision of estimates (even smaller SEs!)
| |
| ** Convert boxplots to a faceted grid in ggplot2.
| |