Editing The Wikipedia Adventure
From CommunityData
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
== Current TO DO list == | == Current TO DO list == | ||
* Fill in section about "Why Gamify Being a Wikipedian?" | |||
* Determine what should be in the discussion section | |||
* Redo bar chart graphics | |||
* Revise introduction to focus on two study framing | |||
**Incorporate idea that large scale field testing is important | |||
* Change framing to focus on gamification as well | |||
** Examples from Jake's notes | |||
** See Mako for other sources | |||
** Hamari HICCS | |||
* Fix citations | |||
* Incorporate UIST model paper system evaluation stuff suggested by Mako | |||
* Refine organization of Study 1 findings | |||
* Add overarching discussion & conclusion sections | |||
* | ==Timeline for CSCW 2017 submission== | ||
* | |||
** | ===Friday, April 29=== | ||
** | * draft methods from survey study (Sneha) | ||
** | * draft results from survey study (Sneha) | ||
* draft restructuring of section headers (Sneha) | |||
* recover old pieces of design rationale and add to system design section (Sneha) | |||
* read & discuss new draft sections (Aaron) | |||
* plan next revision (Sneha & Aaron) | |||
* upload to sharelatex (Sneha) | |||
===Tuesday, May 3rd=== | |||
* send out draft of paper to collaborators (Sneha) | |||
===Friday, May 6th=== | |||
* revise subsections for study 1 to keep refining structure (see Aaron's comments in the document) | |||
* revise introduction and framing. | |||
** add justification for 2-study design | |||
** incorporate the argument that large-scale field testing is important. | |||
*** challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members | *** challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members | ||
*** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies). | *** large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies). | ||
* | * share completed draft with collaborators and solicit feedback on revision plans | ||
===Thursday, May 12th=== | |||
* | * revise discussion to incorporate two study framing, and make sure concerns about framing TWA as a failure are addressed (Sneha) | ||
* make sure the description of study 1 is consistent with how Jake and Jonathan remember conducting it (Sneha) | |||
* | * Analyze differential attrition in field experiment (Sneha) | ||
* Beef up systems design and evaluation section (Jonathan, Jake) | |||
* | ** Explain design rationale | ||
* | ** Identify key features | ||
** Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model. | |||
** | |||
* | |||
* | |||
** | |||
===Friday, May 13th=== | |||
* redo survey bar charts and graphics | |||
* get citations working | |||
* build up a prior work section gamified tutorials | |||
===Friday, May 20th=== | |||
* read it a hundred times, make sure the title works | * read it a hundred times, make sure the title works | ||
===Friday, May 27th=== | ===Friday, May 27th=== | ||
* submit final version! (though earlier is better) | * submit final version! (though earlier is better) | ||