Editing Statistics and Statistical Programming (Winter 2021)/Problem set 9

From CommunityData
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 56: Line 56:
Reinhart (§1) argues that confidence intervals are preferable to p-values. Be prepared to explain, support and/or refute Reinhart's argument in your own words.
Reinhart (§1) argues that confidence intervals are preferable to p-values. Be prepared to explain, support and/or refute Reinhart's argument in your own words.


=== RQ2. Emotional contagion ===
=== RQ2. Emotional contagion (revisited) ===


Let's talk about the short emotional contagion paper:
Revisit the paper we read a couple of weeks ago:
 
: Kramer, Adam D. I., Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' 111(24):8788–90. [[http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full Open Access]]
: Kramer, Adam D. I., Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. Experimental Evidence of Massive-Scale Emotional Contagion through Social Networks. ''Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences'' 111(24):8788–90. {{avail-uw|http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full}}


Come to class prepared to discuss your answers to the following questions.  
Come to class prepared to discuss your answers to the following questions.  
Line 66: Line 65:
==== RQ2a. Hypotheses ====
==== RQ2a. Hypotheses ====
Write down, in your own words, the key pairs of null/alternative hypotheses tested in the paper (hint: the four pairs that correspond to the main effects represented in the figure).
Write down, in your own words, the key pairs of null/alternative hypotheses tested in the paper (hint: the four pairs that correspond to the main effects represented in the figure).
====RQ2b. Describe the effects ====
====RQ2b. Describe the effects ====
Describe, in your own words, the main effects estimated in the paper for these four key pairs of hypotheses.
Describe, in your own words, the main effects estimated in the paper for these four key pairs of hypotheses.
====RQ2c. Statistical vs. practical significance ====
====RQ2c. Statistical vs. practical significance ====
The authors report ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_size#Cohen's_d Cohen's d]'' along with their regression estimates of the main effects. Look up the formula for ''Cohen's d.'' Discuss the ''substantive'' or ''practical'' significance of the estimates given the magnitudes of the ''d'' values reported.
The authors report ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect_size#Cohen's_d Cohen's d]'' along with their regression estimates of the main effects. Look up the formula for ''Cohen's d.'' Discuss the ''substantive'' or ''practical'' significance of the estimates given the magnitudes of the ''d'' values reported.
Please note that all contributions to CommunityData are considered to be released under the Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (see CommunityData:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)

Template used on this page: