Editing Research gambits

Eminent sociologist [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Abbott| Andrew Abbott]]  wrote the excellent book '''Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences'''. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research questions -- and mixing in a few of my own.

* Splitting and lumping. "Folks have mostly studied X and Y together, and they ought to be thought about separately." "Folks have mostly studied X and Y separately, but really these are both examples of Z, and let's study Z." 

* Key axes. Where is race in this phenomenon? Where is class? Gender? Sexuality? Ethnicity? Caste? Disability? Nationality? Citizenship? Culture? Age? Rural vs urban? Education? Labor?

* Micro to macro. What can we see in individuals, groups, communities, societies? Families, neighborhoods, cities, states, countries?

* Cooperation, competition.

* Platforms and social media.
Latest revision		Your text
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Eminent sociologist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Abbott\| Andrew Abbott] wrote the excellent book '''Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences'''. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research questions -- and mixing in a few of my own.		Eminent sociologist [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Abbott\| Andrew Abbott]] wrote the excellent book '''Methods of Discovery: Heuristics for the Social Sciences'''. The book is highly recommended for anyone thinking about pursuing a social science research career or even just trying to come up with a good thesis to finish a degree program. In the list below I am distilling out some of my favorite "gambits" he offers -- prompts for thinking about research questions -- and mixing in a few of my own.

	* Splitting and lumping. "Folks have mostly studied X and Y together, and they ought to be thought about separately." "Folks have mostly studied X and Y separately, but really these are both examples of Z, and let's study Z."		* Splitting and lumping. "Folks have mostly studied X and Y together, and they ought to be thought about separately." "Folks have mostly studied X and Y separately, but really these are both examples of Z, and let's study Z."