Editing Internet Research Methods (Spring 2016)
From CommunityData
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 252: | Line 252: | ||
=== Week 2: Wednesday April 6: Web Archiving === | === Week 2: Wednesday April 6: Web Archiving === | ||
'''Facilitator:''' Janny | '''Facilitator:''' Janny | ||
Line 260: | Line 259: | ||
* Schneider, Steven, Kirsten Foot, and Paul Wouters, 2009, “[https://canvas.uw.edu/files/35982270/download?download_frd=1 Web Archiving as E-Research],” in e-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice, Nicholas Jankowski (Ed.), Routledge, pp. 205-221. ''[Available in Canvas]'' | * Schneider, Steven, Kirsten Foot, and Paul Wouters, 2009, “[https://canvas.uw.edu/files/35982270/download?download_frd=1 Web Archiving as E-Research],” in e-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice, Nicholas Jankowski (Ed.), Routledge, pp. 205-221. ''[Available in Canvas]'' | ||
* Brügger, N. (2011). [https://canvas.uw.edu/files/35981768/download?download_frd=1 Web archiving—Between past, present, and future.] In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (Eds.), The Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 24–42). Chichester, West Susssex: Blackwell. ''[Available in Canvas]'' | * Brügger, N. (2011). [https://canvas.uw.edu/files/35981768/download?download_frd=1 Web archiving—Between past, present, and future.] In M. Consalvo & C. Ess (Eds.), The Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 24–42). Chichester, West Susssex: Blackwell. ''[Available in Canvas]'' | ||
* Rogers, Richard, Chapter 3 "[https://canvas.uw.edu/files/35982101/download?download_frd=1 The Website as Archived Object]" from Digital Methods, pp. 61-82. ''[Available through Canvas]'' | * Rogers, Richard, Chapter 3 "[https://canvas.uw.edu/files/35982101/download?download_frd=1 The Website as Archived Object]" from Digital Methods, pp. 61-82. ''[Available through Canvas]'' | ||
* Graeff, E., Stempeck, M., & Zuckerman, E. (2014). [http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4947 The battle for “Trayvon Martin”: Mapping a media controversy online and off-line.] First Monday, 19(2). ''[Free Online]'' | * Graeff, E., Stempeck, M., & Zuckerman, E. (2014). [http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4947 The battle for “Trayvon Martin”: Mapping a media controversy online and off-line.] First Monday, 19(2). ''[Free Online]'' | ||
Line 319: | Line 318: | ||
'''Required Readings:''' | '''Required Readings:''' | ||
* Robinson, Laura and Jeremy Schulz, " | * Murthy, Dhiraj, "Emergent digital ethnographic methods for social research," Ch. 7 in HET. [Available in Canvas] | ||
* | * Robinson, Laura and Jeremy Schulz, "New fieldsites, new methods: New ethnographic opportunities," Ch. 8 in HET. [Available in Canvas] | ||
* | * Geiger, R. S. and Ribes, D. (2011), "Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination through Documentary Practices," Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. [Available in Canvas] | ||
* | * Response by danah boyd To Hine's "Question One: How Can Qualitative Internet Researchers Define the Boundaries of Their Projects?" from Internet Inquiry: Conversations About Method, Annette Markham and Nancy Baym (Eds.), Sage, 2009, pp. 1-32. [Available in Canvas] | ||
:Note: You may also be interest in reading the essay by Hine that boyd is responding to. [Available in Canvas] | |||
* [Selections] Jemielniak, D. (2014). Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. "Introduction" and "Appendix A: Methodology." [Available in Canvas] | |||
'''Optional Readings:''' | '''Optional Readings:''' | ||
* | * Paccagnella, Luciano (1997), “Getting the Seat of Your Pants Dirty: Strategies for Ethnographic Research on Virtual Communities,” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1), June. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
: Note: This is one of the early academic articles about online participant observation; I recommend it to those who want to read some early pointers. | |||
:Note: | * Humphreys, L. 2007. Mobile social networks and social practice: A case study of dodgeball. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (13) 1. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
This is the | |||
* Humphreys, L | |||
: Note: Dodgeball is a mobile social network system (MSNS) that allows groups of friends to connect and meet up via mobile phone. The author employed participant observation in order to understand norms of interaction in the MSNS "space". | : Note: Dodgeball is a mobile social network system (MSNS) that allows groups of friends to connect and meet up via mobile phone. The author employed participant observation in order to understand norms of interaction in the MSNS "space". | ||
* Brotsky, | * Brotsky, Sarah R. and David Giles. 2007. “Inside the ‘Pro-Ana’ Community: A Covert Participation Observation.” Eating Disorders: pro The Journal of Treatment & Prevention 15(2): 93-109 (http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10640260701190600) | ||
:Note: To conduct the study reported in this paper the authors created a used a fake profile in order to observe the psychological support offered to participants. | :Note: To conduct the study reported in this paper the authors created a used a fake profile in order to observe the psychological support offered to participants. | ||
* | * Beaulieu, Anne, and Mette Terp Hoybye, "Studying mailing lists: Text, temporality, interaction, and materiality at the intersection of e-mail and the web," Ch. 11 in HET. [Available in Canvas] | ||
: Note: Fantastic more general introduction but takeaways that are more specifically targetted toward people studying virtual reality type environments with virtual | * Williams, Matthew. 2007. “Avatar Watching: Participant Observation in Graphical Environments.” Qualitative Research 7(1): 5-24. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
: Note: Fantastic more general introduction but takeaways that are more specifically targetted toward people studying virtual reality type environments with virtual [hysicality. | |||
* Coleman, E. G. (2010). Ethnographic Approaches to Digital Media. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39(1), 487–505. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
* | |||
=== Week 4: Monday April 18: Online Interviews === | === Week 4: Monday April 18: Online Interviews === | ||
Line 353: | Line 344: | ||
'''Required Readings:''' | '''Required Readings:''' | ||
* | * Markham, Annette (1998), "The Shifting Project, the Shifting Self," from Life Online, Altamira Press, 1998, pp. 61-84. [Available in Canvas] | ||
: Note: One of the earliest books on online life and one of the earliest attempts to do online interviewing. This is dated, but highlight some important challenge. | |||
* Hanna, P. (2012). | * Stromer-Galley, Jennifer (2003), "Depth Interviews for the Study of Motives and Perceptions of Internet Use," International Communication Association, San Diego, May. [Available in Canvas] | ||
: Note: Start reading on page 8 on "The Internet and the Interview". The beginning is a theoretical argument that's not really relevant to this class. | |||
* Hanna, P. (2012). Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: a research note. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 239-242. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
: Note: Short article you can basically skim. Read it quickly so you can cite it later. | : Note: Short article you can basically skim. Read it quickly so you can cite it later. | ||
* | * Morgan, David L. and Bojana Lobe, "Online focus groups," Ch. 9 in HET. [Available in Canvas] | ||
'''Optional Readings:''' | '''Optional Readings:''' | ||
* | * Salmons, J. (2014). Qualitative Online Interviews: Strategies, Design, and Skills. SAGE Publications. [Publisher Page] | ||
: Note: Strongly focused on enthnographic interviews with tons of very specific details. Fantastic article on interviewing, | * danah boyd. (Forthcoming). “Making Sense of Teen Life: Strategies for Capturing Ethnographic Data in a Networked Era.” In Hargittai, E. & Sandvig, C. (Eds.) Digital Research Confidential: The Secrets of Studying Behavior Online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Available in Canvas] | ||
: Note: Strongly focused on enthnographic interviews with tons of very specific details. Fantastic article on interviewing, but a bit weak on Internet specific advice. | |||
* Chou, C. (2001). Internet heavy use and addiction among Taiwanese college students: an online interview study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(5), 573-585. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
=== Week 4: Wednesday April 20: Social Network Analysis === | === Week 4: Wednesday April 20: Social Network Analysis === | ||
Line 384: | Line 365: | ||
'''Required Readings:''' | '''Required Readings:''' | ||
* Garton, Laura, Caroline Haythornthwaite, and Barry Wellman, " | * Garton, Laura, Caroline Haythornthwaite, and Barry Wellman, "Studying Online Social Networks," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V. 3, N. 1, June, 1997. [Free Online] | ||
* Howard, Phil, "Network Ethnography and Hypermedia Organization: New Organizations, New Media, New Myths," New Media and Society, December 2002, 4(4), pp. 550-574. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
* Howard, Phil, " | * Mislove, Alan, et al (2007), "Measurement and Analysis of Online Social Networks," IMC 2007, October 24-27, San Diego, CA [Available Through UW Libraries] | ||
* Keegan, B., Gergle, D., & Contractor, N. (2013). | * Keegan, B., Gergle, D., & Contractor, N. (2013). Hot Off the Wiki Structures and Dynamics of Wikipedia’s Coverage of Breaking News Events. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 595–622. [Free Online] | ||
=== Week 4: Saturday April 23: CDSW Session 2 === | === Week 4: Saturday April 23: CDSW Session 2 === | ||
Line 401: | Line 382: | ||
'''Required Readings:''' | '''Required Readings:''' | ||
* Hergueux, J., & Jacquemet, N. (2014). Social preferences in the online laboratory: a randomized experiment. Experimental Economics, 18(2), 251–283. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
* Hergueux, J., & Jacquemet, N. (2014). | * Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). | * Restivo, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2012). Experimental Study of Informal Rewards in Peer Production. PLoS ONE, 7(3), e34358. [Free Online] | ||
* | * Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295–298. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). | * Cosley, D., Frankowski, D., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2007). SuggestBot: Using Intelligent Task Routing to Help People Find Work in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 32–41). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8788–8790. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
: Note: We've already read but I'd like to discuss it again. | |||
'''Optional Readings:''' | '''Optional Readings:''' | ||
* Zhu, H., Zhang, A., He, J., Kraut, R., & Kittur, A. (2013). | * Zhu, H., Zhang, A., He, J., Kraut, R., & Kittur, A. (2013). Effects of Peer Feedback on Contribution: A Field Experiment in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Paris, France: ACM. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Restivo, M., & van de Rijt, A. (0). No praise without effort: experimental evidence on how rewards affect Wikipedia’s contributor community. Information, Communication & Society, 0(0), 1–12. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
* Restivo, M., & van de Rijt, A. (0). | |||
: Note: This piece is, more or less, a continuation of the Restivo and van de Rijt piece included above but it is longer and goes into much more depth on at least one of the important theoretical issues. | : Note: This piece is, more or less, a continuation of the Restivo and van de Rijt piece included above but it is longer and goes into much more depth on at least one of the important theoretical issues. | ||
=== Week 5: Wednesday April 27: Surveys === | === Week 5: Wednesday April 27: Surveys === | ||
Line 425: | Line 402: | ||
'''Required Readings:''' | '''Required Readings:''' | ||
* Van Selm, Martine & Nicholas Jankowski (2006), " | * Van Selm, Martine & Nicholas Jankowski (2006), "Conducting Online Surveys," Quality and Quantity, 40: 435-456. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Walejko, Gina, " | * Walejko, Gina, "Online survey: Instant publication, instant mistake, all of the above," from Research Confidential: Solutions to Problems Most Research Scientists Pretend They Never Have, University of Michigan Press, 2009, pp. 101-121.sk [Available in Canvas] | ||
* Joseph A. Konstan, B. R. Simon Rosser, Michael W. Ross, Jeffrey Stanton, & Weston M. Edwards, | * Joseph A. Konstan, B. R. Simon Rosser, Michael W. Ross, Jeffrey Stanton, & Weston M. Edwards, “The Story of Subject Naught: A Cautionary but Optimistic Tale of Internet Survey Research” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V.10, N. 2, January 2005. [Free Online] | ||
* Hill, B. M., & Shaw, A. (2013). | * Hill, B. M., & Shaw, A. (2013). The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e65782. [Free Online] | ||
* Salganik, M. J., & Levy, K. E. C. ( | * Salganik, M. J., & Levy, K. E. C. (2012). Wiki surveys: Open and quantifiable social data collection. arXiv:1202.0500 [cs, Stat]. [Free Online] | ||
: Note: | : Note: This journalistic account of the research may also be useful. | ||
'''Optional Readings:''' | '''Optional Readings:''' | ||
Line 436: | Line 413: | ||
If you don't have a background in survey design, these two have been recommended by our guest speaker as good basic things to read: | If you don't have a background in survey design, these two have been recommended by our guest speaker as good basic things to read: | ||
* Krosnick, J. A. (1999). | * Krosnick, J. A. (1999).Survey research. Annual Review of Psychology 50, 537-567. [Free Online] | ||
* Krosnick, J. A. (1999). Maximizing measurement quality: Principles of good questionnaire design. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of | * Krosnick, J. A. (1999).Maximizing measurement quality: Principles of good questionnaire design . In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes. New York: Academic Press. [Free Online] | ||
These are other texts on the | These are other texts on the subjct that you might find useul: | ||
* Dal, Michael, " | * Dal, Michael, "Online data collection and data analysis using emergent technologies," Ch. 12 in HET. | ||
* Smith, Tom W. and John Sokolowski, " | * Smith, Tom W. and John Sokolowski, "The use of audiovisuals in surveys," Ch. 19 in HET. | ||
* Kellock, Anne, et. al. " | * Kellock, Anne, et. al. "Using technology and the experience sampling method to understand real life," Ch. 24 from HET. | ||
* Yun, Gi Woong and Craig Trumbo, " | * Yun, Gi Woong and Craig Trumbo, "Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail and Web Form," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V.6, N.1, September, 2000. | ||
* Hargittai, Eszter, and Chris Karr, " | * Hargittai, Eszter, and Chris Karr, "WAT R U DOIN? Studying the Thumb Generation Using Text Messaging," from Research Confidential: Solutions to Problems Most Research Scientists Pretend They Never Have, University of Michigan Press, 2009, pp. 192-216. [Available in Canvas] | ||
* Wright, Kevin, " | * Wright, Kevin, "Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V. 10, N. 3, April 2005. [Free Online] | ||
=== Week 6: Monday May 2: Narrative, Discourse and Visual Analysis === | === Week 6: Monday May 2: Narrative, Discourse and Visual Analysis === | ||
Line 456: | Line 433: | ||
Narrative Analysis: | Narrative Analysis: | ||
* Mitra, | * Mitra, Ananda, "Characteristics of the WWW Text: Tracing Discursive Strategies," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V.5, N. 1, September, 1999. [Free Online] | ||
* Kaun, Anne (2010), " | * Kaun, Anne (2010), "Open-Ended Online Diaries: Capturing Life as it is Narrated," International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p133-148. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Gubrium, Aline and K.C. Nat Turner, "Digital storytelling as an emergent method for social research and practice," Ch. 21 in HET. | |||
Discourse Analysis: | |||
* | * Honeycutt, Courtenay (2005), “Hazing as a process of boundary maintenance in an online community”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(2). [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
:Note: Combines quantitative and qualitative computer-mediated discourse analysis methods.* | |||
Visual Analysis: | Visual Analysis: | ||
* Newbold, Curtis, 2013, " | * Newbold, Curtis, 2013, "How to Do a Visual Analysis (A 5-Step Process)". [Free Online] | ||
: Note: Although I'm not a fan of infograpraphics as a genre, I suppose it makes sense that visual communication people would put together a pretty good one! If you're already familiar with visual analysis from the rhetorical tradition, there's not going to be a lot new here. If this is new for you, this will help you frame and understand the other readings. | : Note: Although I'm not a fan of infograpraphics as a genre, I suppose it makes sense that visual communication people would put together a pretty good one! If you're already familiar with visual analysis from the rhetorical tradition, there's not going to be a lot new here. If this is new for you, this will help you frame and understand the other readings. | ||
* | * Baab, L. M. (2008). Portraits of the future church: A rhetorical analysis of congregational websites. Journal of Communication and Religion, 31(2), 143–181. [Free Online] | ||
: Note: Lynne did her PhD in the UW Communication Deptartment, and this article is based on one of the chapters from her dissertation. She developed the initial research design for this study as a student in an earlier version of this course. | |||
* Hochman, N., & Schwartz, R. (2012). Visualizing Instagram: Tracing Cultural Visual Rhythms. In Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. [Available through UW Libraries] | |||
* Hochman, N., & Manovich, L. (2013). Zooming into an Instagram City: Reading the local through social media. First Monday, 18(7). [Free Online] | |||
'''Optional Readings:''' | |||
* Torralba, A. (2009). Understanding Visual Scenes. Tutorial presented at the NIPS, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Part I. [Free Online] | |||
: Note: This is a two part (each part is one hour) lecture and tutorial by a expert in computer vision. I strongly recommend watching Part I. I think this gives you a good sense of the nature of the kinds of challenges that were (and still are) facing the field of computer vision and anybody trying to have their computer look at images. | : Note: This is a two part (each part is one hour) lecture and tutorial by a expert in computer vision. I strongly recommend watching Part I. I think this gives you a good sense of the nature of the kinds of challenges that were (and still are) facing the field of computer vision and anybody trying to have their computer look at images. | ||
These five paper are all technical approaches to doing image classification using datasets from Internet-based datasets of images like Flickr, Google Image Search, Google Street View, or Instagram. Each of these describes interesting and challenges technical issues. If you're interested, it would be a great idea to read these to get a sense for the state of the art and what is and isn't possible: | These five paper are all technical approaches to doing image classification using datasets from Internet-based datasets of images like Flickr, Google Image Search, Google Street View, or Instagram. Each of these describes interesting and challenges technical issues. If you're interested, it would be a great idea to read these to get a sense for the state of the art and what is and isn't possible: | ||
* Jaffe, A., Naaman, M., Tassa, T., & Davis, M. (2006). | * Jaffe, A., Naaman, M., Tassa, T., & Davis, M. (2006). Generating Summaries and Visualization for Large Collections of Geo-referenced Photographs. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval (pp. 89–98). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Simon, I., Snavely, N., & Seitz, S. M. (2007). | * Simon, I., Snavely, N., & Seitz, S. M. (2007). Scene Summarization for Online Image Collections. In Computer Vision, IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 0, pp. 1–8). Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society. [Free Online] | ||
* Crandall, D. J., Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2009). | * Crandall, D. J., Backstrom, L., Huttenlocher, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2009). Mapping the World’s Photos. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 761–770). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* San Pedro, J., & Siersdorfer, S. (2009). | * San Pedro, J., & Siersdorfer, S. (2009). Ranking and Classifying Attractiveness of Photos in Folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (pp. 771–780). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
* Doersch, C., Singh, S., Gupta, A., Sivic, J., & Efros, A. A. (2012). | * Doersch, C., Singh, S., Gupta, A., Sivic, J., & Efros, A. A. (2012). What Makes Paris Look Like Paris? ACM Trans. Graph., 31(4), 101:1–101:9. [Available through UW Libraries] | ||
=== Week 6: Wednesday May 4: Design Research === | |||
''' | '''To Be Decided''' | ||
=== Week 6: Saturday May 7: CDSW Session 3 === | === Week 6: Saturday May 7: CDSW Session 3 === | ||
Line 525: | Line 474: | ||
This session will run from 9am-3pm. Details on the [[CDSW Spring 2016]] page. | This session will run from 9am-3pm. Details on the [[CDSW Spring 2016]] page. | ||
=== Week 7: Monday May 9: Consulting Week | === Week 7: Monday May 9: NO CLASS (Consulting Week) === | ||
During this week, we not meet together. Instead, I will schedule one-on-one in person meetings of an hour with each student individually to catch up with | During this week, we not meet together. Instead, I will schedule one-on-one in person meetings of at least half an hour with each student individually to catch up with about your project and to work directly with you to resolve any technical issues you have run into with data collection, etc. | ||
=== Week 7: Wednesday May 11: Consulting Week | === Week 7: Wednesday May 11: NO CLASS (Consulting Week) === | ||
=== Week 8: Monday May 16: Crowdsourced Data Analysis === | |||
'''Assignment:''' | |||
* Find and complete at least 2 "hits" as a worker on Amazon Mechnical Turk. | |||
* Forthcoming assignment on running your own hit on AMT. I'm currently waiting for details from a collaborator who used a similar assignment similar in the past. | |||
'''Required Readings:''' | '''Required Readings:''' | ||
* | * Amazon Mechanical Turk Requester UI Guide (pp. 1-15). [Free Online] | ||
* J. | * Amazon Mechanical Turk Best Practices Guide. [Free Online] | ||
* | * Weinberg, J., Freese, J., & McElhattan, D. (2014). Comparing Data Characteristics and Results of an Online Factorial Survey between a Population-Based and a Crowdsource-Recruited Sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310. [Free Online] | ||
* Shaw, A. (2015). Hired Hands and Dubious Guesses: Adventures in Crowdsourced Data Collection. In E. Hargittai & C. Sandvig (Eds.), Digital Research Confidential: The Secrets of Studying Behavior Online. The MIT Press. [Available in Canvas] | |||
=== Week 9: | === Week 8: Wednesday May 18: TBD === | ||
=== Week 9: Monday May 23: Sensor Data === | |||
'''Required Readings:''' | '''Required Readings:''' | ||
Read any 2 of these 4 chapters | Read any 2 of these 4 HET chapters: | ||
* Eagle, Nathan, "Mobile phones as sensors for social research," Ch. 22 in HET. | |||
* Visser, Albertine and Ingrid Mulder, "Emergent technologies for assessing social feelings and experiences," Ch. 16 in HET. | |||
* de Haan, Geert, et. al., "Bringing the research lab into everyday life: Exploiting sensitive environments to acquire data for social research," Ch. 23 in HET. | |||
* Fowler, Chris, et. al., "Living laboratories: Social research applications and evaluations," Ch. 27 in HET. | |||
* Holohan, Anne, et. al., "The digital home: A new locus of social science research," Ch. 28 in HET. | |||
=== | === Week 9: Wednesday May 25: Hyperlink Networks === | ||
* Jackson, Michele, (1997), "Assessing the Structure of the Communication on the World Wide Web," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V. 3, N. 1, June, 1997. | * Jackson, Michele, (1997), "Assessing the Structure of the Communication on the World Wide Web," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, V. 3, N. 1, June, 1997. | ||
* Jackson, Michele, (2011), "What Should Researchers Infer From Links on an Organization's Site?", blog post at http://assett.colorado.edu/jackson/what-should-researchers-infer-from-links-on-an-organizations-site/ | * Jackson, Michele, (2011), "What Should Researchers Infer From Links on an Organization's Site?", blog post at http://assett.colorado.edu/jackson/what-should-researchers-infer-from-links-on-an-organizations-site/ | ||
* Olesen, Thomas (2004), "The Transnational Zapatista Solidarity Network: An Infrastructure Analysis," Global Networks, 4(1):89-107 [Although this article uses the term infrastructure analysis, the method employed is best described as a hyperlink network analysis.] | * Olesen, Thomas (2004), "The Transnational Zapatista Solidarity Network: An Infrastructure Analysis," Global Networks, 4(1):89-107 [Although this article uses the term infrastructure analysis, the method employed is best described as a hyperlink network analysis.] | ||
=== Week 10: Monday May 30: Final Presentations === | |||
=== Week 10: Wednesday June 1: Final Presentations === | |||
== Administrative Notes == | == Administrative Notes == |