Editing HCDS (Fall 2017)/Schedule (section)

=== Week 3: October 12 ===
[[HCDS_(Fall_2017)/Day_3_plan|Day 3 plan]]

[[:File:HCDS Week 3 slides.pdf|Day 3 slides]]

;Data provenance, preparation, and reproducibility: ''data curation, preservation, documentation, and archiving; best practices for open scientific research''

;Assignments due
* Week 2 reading reflection

;Agenda
{{:HCDS (Fall 2017)/Day 3 plan}}

;Readings assigned 
*Read: Chapter 2 [https://www.practicereproducibleresearch.org/core-chapters/2-assessment.html "Assessing Reproducibility"] and Chapter 3 [https://www.practicereproducibleresearch.org/core-chapters/3-basic.html "The Basic Reproducible Workflow Template"] from ''The Practice of Reproducible Research'' University of California Press, 2018. 
* Read: Hickey, Walt. [https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-dollar-and-cents-case-against-hollywoods-exclusion-of-women/ ''The Dollars and Cents Case Against Hollywood's Exclusion of Women.''] FiveThirtyEight, 2014. '''AND''' Keegan, Brian. [https://github.com/brianckeegan/Bechdel/blob/master/Bechdel_test.ipynb ''The Need for Openness in Data Journalism.''] 2014.

;Homework assigned
* Reading reflection
* [[HCDS_(Fall_2017)/Assignments#A1:_Data_curation|A1: Data curation]]

;Examples of well-documented open research projects
* Keegan, Brian. [https://github.com/brianckeegan/WeatherCrime ''WeatherCrime'']. GitHub, 2014.
* Geiger, Stuart R. and Halfaker, Aaron. [https://github.com/halfak/are-the-bots-really-fighting ''Operationalizing conflict and cooperation between automated software agents in Wikipedia: A replication and expansion of "Even Good Bots Fight"'']. GitHub, 2017.
* Thain, Nithum; Dixon, Lucas; and Wulczyn, Ellery. [https://figshare.com/articles/Wikipedia_Talk_Labels_Toxicity/4563973 ''Wikipedia Talk Labels: Toxicity'']. Figshare, 2017.
* Narayan, Sneha et al. [https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/6HPRIG ''Replication Data for: The Wikipedia Adventure: Field Evaluation of an Interactive Tutorial for New Users'']. Harvard Dataverse, 2017.

;Examples of not-so-well documented open research projects
* Eclarke. [https://github.com/eclarke/swga_paper SWGA paper]. GitHub, 2016.
* David Lefevre. [https://figshare.com/articles/Lefevre_and_Cox_Delayed_instructional_feedback_may_be_more_effective_but_is_this_contrary_to_learners_preferences_/2061303 ''Lefevre and Cox: Delayed instructional feedback may be more effective, but is this contrary to learners’ preferences?''] Figshare, 2016.
* Alneberg. [https://github.com/BinPro/paper-data ''CONCOCT Paper Data'']. GitHub, 2014.

;Other resources
* Press, Gil. [https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2016/03/23/data-preparation-most-time-consuming-least-enjoyable-data-science-task-survey-says/#2608257f6f63 ''Cleaning Big Data: Most Time-Consuming, Least Enjoyable Data Science Task, Survey Says.''] Forbes, 2016.
* Christensen, Garret. [https://github.com/garretchristensen/BestPracticesManual/blob/master/Manual.pdf ''Manual of Best Practices in Transparent Social Science Research.''] 2016.
* Hickey, Walt. [https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-bechdel-test-checking-our-work/ ''The Bechdel Test: Checking Our Work'']. FiveThirtyEight, 2014. 
* Chapman et al. [ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/support/Modeler/Documentation/14/UserManual/CRISP-DM.pdf ''Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining'']. IBM, 2000.


<br/>
<hr/>
<br/>