Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Navigation
Main page
About
People
Publications
Teaching
Resources
Research Blog
Wiki Functions
Recent changes
Help
Licensing
Project page
Discussion
Edit
View history
Editing
CommunityData:Automating and Streamlining Walkthrough
(section)
From CommunityData
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Revise and Resubmit ==== Revise and resubmit makes papers better but can be a time crunch and if you have co-authors, it can get hard to tell what's been done or what certain revisions were trying to accomplish. When you get reviews back that ask you to make changes, you can save yourself a lot of annoyance if you follow this four-part method: # Keep a copy of your original submission, including the main.tex file (if you are using .Rtex file because you followed the above advice about automation....please note that the main.tex file is hidden in Overleaf -- click the little 'document' icon next to 'Recompile' (mouseover has a tooltip that says 'Logs and output files' -- then 'Other logs and files' at the bottom right -- note that the output.bbl file is there too, that's also useful because you'll want it for your upload to arXiv if you post a preprint). You will need this for the LaTeX Diff below. This is the first stage of responding to a review---but it's one you can do even before the reviews are back. # Paste all reviews into a Google Sheet---[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ZMMKI3HQ6bOTRT0oF5ohBtVLqo3ye65J5WJ-rn6WxsM/edit?usp=sharing feel free to use this as a template]. This is useful for the second stage of responding to a review, when maybe you're working through some emotional responses, trying to figure out what to do, etc. # Paste all reviews into a response to reviewers letter document in the same Overleaf project where you wrote the paper. Place them below the '''\end{document}''' line so they won't show up. This is useful for the third stage of responding to a review---actually revising. As you revise to address the issue, move the comment up into the letter, quote it and then write what you did. Mark and comment the bit of your paper you copy-pasted (something like: ''populate any edits made into reviewer response''). It might feel a skosh redundant with the Google Sheet, and it is ... think of it as double-entry bookkeeping to make sure nothing gets dropped. # Show your work: some venues require (and reviewers often appreciate) a document that shows what was changed. If you use Word, that means turning on Track Changes. If you use LaTeX, [[CommunityData:LaTex Diff | latexdiff is a way to achieve this]]. Latexdiff is available on [[CommunityData:Kibo]]. Making sure you have a nice clean diff and letter is the final stage of responding to a review. Please note that the '''cdsc_example''' repository contains examples of past revision processes.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to CommunityData are considered to be released under the Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (see
CommunityData:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information