Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Navigation
Main page
About
People
Publications
Teaching
Resources
Research Blog
Wiki Functions
Recent changes
Help
Licensing
Page
Discussion
Edit
View history
Editing
Professional Development Proseminar: Funding (Fall 2021)
(section)
From CommunityData
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Session 1: October 5 === '''Topic:''' Course Overview/Expectations '''Readings:''' (finish ''before'' class) * Braithwaite, Dawn O., and Patrice Buzzanell. 2008. “Understanding and Applying for Grants and Funding for Communication Studies.” In Getting the Most from Your Graduate Education in Communication a Student’s Handbook: A Student’s Handbook, edited by Sherwyn Morreale and Pat Arneson, 145–58. Washington, DC: National Communication Association. {{available-free|1=https://www.natcom.org/sites/default/files/pages/NCA_Career_Center_Getting_the_Most_from_the_Graduate_Education_in_Communication.pdf#page=159}} '''Assignment:''' (finish ''before'' class) Find the curriculum vitæ of at least 6 senior and/or highly respected scholars who are doing working your area and collect information about if and where they have received funding over their entire career. Ideally, these will be people whose work you have cited and read as well as people who have had generally successful careers. Your advisor might be one of them I want you to look further afield as well. * I want you to look at least 3 people who are communication scholars doing work in your discipline (i.e., rhetoricians, interpersonal communication scholars, and so on). * I want you to look at least 3 people who are studying the ''phenomena'' you are interested but who are in other disciplines or fields. For example, if you are studying social support you might look at related work in psychology, public health, or computer science. If you are interested in racial inequality you might look at demographic, sociology, political science, or public health. If you can, choose individuals from fields who typically relies on grant funding. Six is the absolute minimum and I strongly encourage you all to do this for twice as many if you can. This assignment shouldn't take very long. If you can, please do more. '''Class Plan:''' * Introductions to each other * Brief lecture introducing to the course + Q&A * Discussion of synchronous communication options * Share-outs & feedback from assignments * Walk through and discussion for next week's assignments
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to CommunityData are considered to be released under the Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported (see
CommunityData:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information