The Wikipedia Adventure

Project page for The Wikipedia Adventure paper co-authored by Sneha Narayan, Jake Orlowitz, Jonathan Morgan, Mako Hill, and Aaron Shaw.

Current Status
We are in the process of revising this for submission to CSCW 2017. The timeline and milestones for submission are living on this page (below).

Resources

 * We're writing on sharelatex. The project lives here.
 * Bibliography is currently stored in a shared zotero directory. Aaron and Mako can share access if needed.

Friday, April 29

 * draft methods from survey study (Sneha)
 * draft results from survey study (Sneha)
 * draft restructuring of section headers (Sneha)
 * recover old pieces of design rationale and add to system design section (Sneha)
 * read & discuss new draft sections (Aaron)
 * plan next revision (Sneha & Aaron)
 * upload to sharelatex (Sneha)

Tuesday, May 3rd

 * send out draft of paper to collaborators (Sneha)

Friday, May 6th

 * revise subsections for study 1 to keep refining structure (see Aaron's comments in the document)
 * revise introduction and framing.
 * add justification for 2-study design
 * incorporate the argument that large-scale field testing is important.
 * challenges of deploying new systems in a massive community with passionate, experienced members
 * large-scale user survey and invitation-based field experiment under realistic conditions provide more useful evidence (than hallway testing or small-scale usability studies).
 * revise the discussion (make sure concerns about framing TWA as a failure are addressed).
 * share completed draft with collaborators and solicit feedback on revision plans

Friday, May 13th

 * incorporate feedback from collaborators
 * redo survey bar charts and graphics

Friday, May 20th

 * read it a hundred times, make sure the title works

Friday, May 27th

 * submit final version! (though earlier is better)

Revision plans

 * Change framing to focus on gamification as well
 * Examples from Jake's notes
 * See Mako for other sources
 * Hamari HICCS
 * Beef up systems design and evaluation section
 * Explain design rationale
 * Identify key features
 * Use Webstrates paper (UIST 2015) as a model.
 * Improve Study 1 description
 * Additional details from Jonathan's and Jake's records
 * Supplement Study 2
 * Analyze differential attrition in field experiment