Editing Dialogues/Underproduction
From CommunityData
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
;Where: [https://citp.princeton.edu/ Center for Information Technology Policy], 3rd Floor on [https://m.princeton.edu/default/map/index?filter=sherrerd%20hall&_recenter=true Sherrerd Hall], Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey | ;Where: [https://citp.princeton.edu/ Center for Information Technology Policy], 3rd Floor on [https://m.princeton.edu/default/map/index?filter=sherrerd%20hall&_recenter=true Sherrerd Hall], Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey | ||
;Who: Attendance at this event is by invitation only. | ;Who: Attendance at this event is by invitation only. | ||
;Organizers: [[Benjamin Mako Hill]], [ | ;Organizers: [[Benjamin Mako Hill]], [[Aaron Shaw]], [[Kaylea Champion]] | ||
Imagine if we lined up every piece of open source software in terms of how important it was. Now imagine that we also lined them up in terms of their quality or the share of developer attention given to each piece of software's upkeep. Wouldn't it be great if the two things were strongly aligned so that the most important stuff was also the highest quality? Research has shown that in the case of open source software and Wikipedia, this is frequently not the case. | Imagine if we lined up every piece of open source software in terms of how important it was. Now imagine that we also lined them up in terms of their quality or the share of developer attention given to each piece of software's upkeep. Wouldn't it be great if the two things were strongly aligned so that the most important stuff was also the highest quality? Research has shown that in the case of open source software and Wikipedia, this is frequently not the case. |